IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [calsify] WGLC JSCalendar

"Neil Jenkins" <neilj@fastmailteam.com> Fri, 25 October 2019 06:08 UTC

Return-Path: <neilj@fastmailteam.com>
X-Original-To: calsify@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: calsify@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37F6812003F for <calsify@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 23:08:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fastmailteam.com header.b=3NmxUI0k; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=Rj3Ks8Xm
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 478kGW4ffoW6 for <calsify@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 23:08:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7131E1200E7 for <calsify@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 23:08:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 928E8567; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 02:08:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap99 ([10.202.2.99]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 25 Oct 2019 02:08:36 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= fastmailteam.com; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to :references:date:from:to:subject:content-type; s=fm1; bh=ZrYoGlT mycup+Xi6thwg/edsWUXYLp0OX+CiHxiyya0=; b=3NmxUI0k5nkQVa5NmescLU8 VkBHygzCBmZ4XqxrmChVIvVvYoLVs4+G3SJeRFMoM9X2+E/xax9U06rTQD1owJHT kTltD3qRYTVqyNpOwZlDPqL7eOoPpivcF7QBQlbfL/vTdBO2GbWyQln/S3Q6Yi8m Eaf/LSu5iCfTsdJpRwxCGpcx8S5E+rxTeDqWUIBdhJ3qmryStMSPcSQe8RPFcge5 fMAJTaJVITVu+nHu/wodfxPtYlyVXfJNqfcpW9FJZi+srx+SlaAjfNuDu2rW0IiN dZzhwCJ81e8E4y9Zheen8T/gLYG8n4nqsIGD5BWO7WRwqfpm0qcJOVZ6EX/WNcA= =
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=ZrYoGl Tmycup+Xi6thwg/edsWUXYLp0OX+CiHxiyya0=; b=Rj3Ks8XmRRcsHS6/8HA7pp Z+xMYQG2vnXLvO55fST50tC4kH4PagIfdLDUxQuDqrXfJ08EBANspczMMUOpI/xN rJ09F75Yr9LPnJWE6TPT1D3pWHMb2RaQwkrxpd2iIZSZXiV2qbUKQtvAIlp5p8yu ktRnEs6YLzqtZDVxgqW/Xids8zCuxaWfL1+TrI+7fwVilCXc+VJO3B1bqaa+AN3y L8OXhk7LwHAW3yVGHfJ3xURAHdKkiKOq9qI+XYiaXASo4SIIz4J0/4M7kBLUaEOA nl75lu2/4tCmc40UNJbwOQZ0xfvDqpCC8XBj+TBp6QQAHl3wXQPnavTVuU3zjZ4A ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:Y5GyXXw44N56Vf9Os-JbXCYFaNwKnaWx5KAn12-QhWmR62hqo4xm7w>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedufedrledvgddutddvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgesrgdtreerreerjeenucfhrhhomhepfdfpvghi lhculfgvnhhkihhnshdfuceonhgvihhljhesfhgrshhtmhgrihhlthgvrghmrdgtohhmqe enucffohhmrghinhepihgvthhfrdhorhhgnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehn vghilhhjsehfrghsthhmrghilhhtvggrmhdrtghomhenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpe dt
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:Y5GyXThqrJOXYo8vSSTWGOhksLjez5F-lprtAjKKlcWABstIQpudlA> <xmx:Y5GyXcV2IgVrMKbglehSuQ95pwkRtivrBXyhMr5aECR1B74ervErxA> <xmx:Y5GyXV2Z_IhGJvIKGlbMFYyc7vvdkF295NfU3CCVJVvMqUpEGH9kVA> <xmx:ZJGyXeW5rrp_Y5SVcxY0OBwr7iVawb73FYDEo_zXycAY5NrlTW9qZQ>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id C2ED038E7F3; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 02:08:35 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.1.7-470-gedfae93-fmstable-20191021v4
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <595e1efa-97a0-4373-8d5f-d4e5e05a1838@dogfood.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <98a0f7ca-213d-4be0-9b0c-310dad70c0ab@gmail.com>
References: <DM6PR15MB3531E3B26D3C5294B1D40564E3930@DM6PR15MB3531.namprd15.prod.outlook.com> <6d0fa1f3-5dbe-d4df-821f-a0bddb61546b@gmail.com> <3d216646-0235-0af4-b9ad-1401eea482c4@gmail.com> <c89952c7-90b9-ef17-0c7c-aceacde771e2@gmail.com> <7f83a966-d1e9-464e-acd2-45bb7fd05107@beta.fastmail.com> <98a0f7ca-213d-4be0-9b0c-310dad70c0ab@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 17:08:15 +1100
From: Neil Jenkins <neilj@fastmailteam.com>
To: Michael Douglass <mikeadouglass@gmail.com>, Daniel Migault <daniel.migault=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "calsify@ietf.org" <calsify@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="a5c80a8e9518427db548c4014c4a656c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/calsify/mH3UPf6WfOvrEExmrJoJu-PIcPY>
Subject: Re: [calsify] WGLC JSCalendar
X-BeenThere: calsify@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <calsify.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/calsify>, <mailto:calsify-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/calsify/>
List-Post: <mailto:calsify@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:calsify-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/calsify>, <mailto:calsify-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 06:08:40 -0000

On Fri, 25 Oct 2019, at 07:47, Michael Douglass wrote:
> In section 6.8 should the localization example have @type 


No, it's a map of type `String[PatchObject]`, not its own type.

>> Yes, this is intentional. The property context is different between them and they have different definitions.
> I'd prefer one of them had been called scheduleStatus. Can't validate the value without the context


I think you're always going to need the context to validate properly. The status property in RFC5545 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5545#section-3.2.12> is basically the same. It's not really the scheduleStatus, it's the event/task status.

> Also I feel categories for locations would have been better as locationType

Sure, I'll change that.

> Section 6.3 - simple group -
> Is that example correct?

No!

>  Is it supposed to be … [elided] …

Yes! I'll fix that.

Cheers,
Neil.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email