IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Captive-portals] Use Case: "Carrier Grade Captive Portal"

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 10 May 2017 12:53 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49E76128BA2 for <captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 May 2017 05:53:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eeM6zlmnbw-o for <captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 May 2017 05:53:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFE5E128D8B for <captive-portals@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 May 2017 05:53:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id E47662009E; Wed, 10 May 2017 09:19:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from obiwan.sandelman.ca (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BA76636E0; Wed, 10 May 2017 08:53:01 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
cc: Erik Kline <ek@google.com>, Heiko Folkerts <heiko.folkerts@bsi.bund.de>, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>, "captive-portals@ietf.org" <captive-portals@ietf.org>, "Herzig, Willi" <willi.herzig@bsi.bund.de>, Gunther Nitzsche <gnitzsche@netcologne.de>, Dave Dolson <ddolson@sandvine.com>
In-Reply-To: <930A9E64-64FC-4A5D-95FF-D91EBAB22718@mnot.net>
References: <201705031442.50683.heiko.folkerts@bsi.bund.de> <E8355113905631478EFF04F5AA706E98705C6C57@wtl-exchp-1.sandvine.com> <CAHw9_iJARf4MUA8nHqHA54jLvJNq-_Vek67A-rjHpSK6vC7r+Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAAedzxrmHyuC90EqsxNXra--VHN4x24XpC+fex5ka0pb3gGvFA@mail.gmail.com> <930A9E64-64FC-4A5D-95FF-D91EBAB22718@mnot.net>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.6+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 08:53:01 -0400
Message-ID: <20991.1494420781@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/captive-portals/3U3n8REGzLfe81ogzWvVVQE2hFM>
Subject: Re: [Captive-portals] Use Case: "Carrier Grade Captive Portal"
X-BeenThere: captive-portals@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of issues related to captive portals <captive-portals.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/captive-portals>, <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/captive-portals/>
List-Post: <mailto:captive-portals@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/captive-portals>, <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 12:53:04 -0000

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
    > That's useful as long as the client is a human is behind a browser. It
    > can also break lots of stuff...

Exactly why the ICMP is useful :-)


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email