IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Captive-portals] Thoughts/comments on draft-nottingham-capport-problem-01

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Mon, 04 April 2016 20:42 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D76B12D899 for <captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 13:42:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PSPWSOYZY_rD for <captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 13:42:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ig0-x22e.google.com (mail-ig0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9260C12D898 for <captive-portals@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 13:42:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ig0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id gy3so37858501igb.0 for <captive-portals@ietf.org>; Mon, 04 Apr 2016 13:42:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ygj6Os+YbcFNzZZ/Jf4HpvwYzixb1atqOlzoZ/VsmuA=; b=Wb+T65GlqshSjeg1lYlP9JEsQFtqoFbG4R35ZUPOOuV4t82fikfrn+shyoqWWAkGGq BneUQWZaXhN1oXPampQl0aCurEzQ1nTHC/W00Bw1vnKAPJLI7rn43B0lArqcClay4xE8 RZW0P2yxfz/o2+p3KFH+Pjrwlwdt5FR8Iduw7C8mtcSdiAh4FmqdWH+LtnCAs6N0vrCz rt1Dtd4tVnu5BH/NdTwP2oX84gbviSrwa1j0jiS3JODNxHkLUJuyKsftAKaknsWEKA/q 3aH2mi5H/eRuOugsoLeJgkORKlKSyn8nzNgWNId95VB+7bPOU2BUE8ooI8PEl4ykVEwW Uukg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ygj6Os+YbcFNzZZ/Jf4HpvwYzixb1atqOlzoZ/VsmuA=; b=W+keGRFkrtS6k8QINqI1E2Pt9kHS+L0jBi1K0M8eNtBDGdwU9zfmRZtyH401sACpzz vRnm5txjZz7jVWrVcgPqMzCxBxNSRkNd/2nWIR6e7nbBPEuLeh7NaGTHJxgUvthrS1/p pU+goxKY8fw6mKOhjWDXa8FApIoo2o46cdTTcw7KlDu6Qyjqd2nhWqKpRkuJVTJkpUSH QCYAG6iy4DOTDoOkf2TxzF4CniHX+8PVHgS8yi7hbu7jKxMI9OJ8BhUgiwf1mNqjsYuQ cw/yG9ozcmcHtZDseFEA976SNktv0hv9Bx7DMxwbCAFtSaRV+izZ0jttqnzAG/uJovYj DoFw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLi2lPcaguGOayO6gByat2AWBDNknNx8PwCgcCYmfcUJ4IOAZXZZAbc+ZgtCJzSXD3dTrWLaXHLg5ldFQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.166.72 with SMTP id p69mr8143531ioe.100.1459802541859; Mon, 04 Apr 2016 13:42:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.36.43.5 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 13:42:21 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <17765.1459795394@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
References: <D328543E.51AC4%adam.cohen-rose@sky.uk> <17765.1459795394@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2016 17:42:21 -0300
Message-ID: <CABkgnnUwB99O-gQfi9j2C=doBSVcf1bHdmhX=zV2C31huGVj0w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/captive-portals/6M8nK73kPoKsC9c0kx1JVUESeSk>
Cc: "Cohen-Rose, Adam" <Adam.Cohen-Rose@sky.uk>, "captive-portals@ietf.org" <captive-portals@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Captive-portals] Thoughts/comments on draft-nottingham-capport-problem-01
X-BeenThere: captive-portals@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of issues related to captive portals <captive-portals.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/captive-portals>, <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/captive-portals/>
List-Post: <mailto:captive-portals@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/captive-portals>, <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2016 20:42:27 -0000

On 4 April 2016 at 15:43, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
> So, a URL-scheme that could contain a pointer to the other SSID.

You mean something I could put on my webpage that, if clicked, would
cause a device to connect to the identified SSID?  That might be less
than good.  I thought that Adam was talking about plain ol' text, but
maybe he can confirm.

>     > I¹m very happy to contribute towards an industry survey and will keep
>     > following the discussion in the mailing list.
>
> I'm super-happy to have you on the list.

Likewise.  It's good to have this sort of perspective.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email