IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Casm] Fwd: CASM BoF Preparation

joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Thu, 02 March 2017 16:28 UTC

Return-Path: <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Original-To: casm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: casm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C144012956C for <casm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 08:28:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bFq3FirnRecP for <casm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 08:28:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BD2D129521 for <CASM@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 08:28:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mb.local (c-73-202-177-209.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.202.177.209]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id v22GS4dQ035910 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 2 Mar 2017 16:28:04 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: nagasaki.bogus.com: Host c-73-202-177-209.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.202.177.209] claimed to be mb.local
To: Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>, "CASM@ietf.org" <CASM@ietf.org>
References: <b388be67-d9cd-bed6-b25d-3344e22c5434@cisco.com> <D1A084E5-A661-4CA5-9A4A-5403C549EDEE@viagenie.ca>
From: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
Message-ID: <0df12948-99a7-16da-f2ee-6681f72b61a5@bogus.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2017 08:27:58 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <D1A084E5-A661-4CA5-9A4A-5403C549EDEE@viagenie.ca>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="PKKjEXUrkLOEngTM9jmCwfSO6WCsEorpf"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/casm/hS1wq7cKBspLgtA10jgvbTsWg2E>
Subject: Re: [Casm] Fwd: CASM BoF Preparation
X-BeenThere: casm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Centralized Address Space Management <casm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/casm>, <mailto:casm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/casm/>
List-Post: <mailto:casm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:casm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/casm>, <mailto:casm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2017 16:28:07 -0000

On 3/2/17 4:44 AM, Marc Blanchet wrote:
> I suggest we use Benoit email as the primary agenda of our call, and
> more specifically:
> 
>   * Which interfaces does CASM plan on standardizing?
>   * What are the envisioned key deliverables?
>   * See Warren's email on "where is the border"?

Yup those are good.

IMHO as an operator with a ipam system, the system itself already exists
and has survived sever iterations of interface this would be another
one, if it faciltates easier interoperability in the future that's great.

joel


> Marc.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CASM mailing list
> CASM@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/casm
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email