IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Cbor] 🔔 Second WGLC on draft-ietf-cbor-edn-literals-08

Christian Amsüss <christian@amsuess.com> Sat, 02 March 2024 15:13 UTC

Return-Path: <christian@amsuess.com>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3E8CC14F60A; Sat, 2 Mar 2024 07:13:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.908
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.908 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JyD9frU6M3of; Sat, 2 Mar 2024 07:13:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.akis.at (smtp.akis.at [IPv6:2a02:b18:500:a515::f455]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86D79C14F605; Sat, 2 Mar 2024 07:13:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from poseidon-mailhub.amsuess.com ([IPv6:2a02:b18:c13b:8010:a800:ff:fede:b1bd]) by smtp.akis.at (8.17.1/8.17.1) with ESMTPS id 422FDWiB002774 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 2 Mar 2024 16:13:32 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from christian@amsuess.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: smtp.akis.at: Host [IPv6:2a02:b18:c13b:8010:a800:ff:fede:b1bd] claimed to be poseidon-mailhub.amsuess.com
Received: from poseidon-mailbox.amsuess.com (hermes.lan [10.13.13.254]) by poseidon-mailhub.amsuess.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B60B3481B; Sat, 2 Mar 2024 16:13:32 +0100 (CET)
Received: from hephaistos.amsuess.com (unknown [IPv6:2a02:b18:c13b:8010:5e45:aa5a:3320:1daa]) by poseidon-mailbox.amsuess.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0CBA4316C6; Sat, 2 Mar 2024 16:13:32 +0100 (CET)
Received: (nullmailer pid 3752 invoked by uid 1000); Sat, 02 Mar 2024 15:13:31 -0000
Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2024 16:13:31 +0100
From: Christian Amsüss <christian@amsuess.com>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Cc: cbor@ietf.org, draft-ietf-cbor-edn-literals@ietf.org
Message-ID: <ZeNCG1Q0RWb88qhK@hephaistos.amsuess.com>
References: <ZeL_cmMQKRg0fReH@hephaistos.amsuess.com> <E716AEB9-58DD-442D-88C9-F8FA9079256A@tzi.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="w1KblRfBITUqVHRq"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <E716AEB9-58DD-442D-88C9-F8FA9079256A@tzi.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/ByEU6QI_S0Cp_fr_Q6chdWZPN04>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] 🔔 Second WGLC on draft-ietf-cbor-edn-literals-08
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2024 15:13:43 -0000

On Sat, Mar 02, 2024 at 03:57:24PM +0100, Carsten Bormann wrote:
> I think you wanted to write
>
> > I do not expect these changes to be controversial

I didn't manage not to avoid mixing up an excessive number of negations
in the line, and neither did I avoid simplifying them too much.

What I should have written is that I expect the changes to be
uncontroversial.

Thanks for catching this
c

-- 
This may seem a bit weird, but that's okay, because it is weird.
  -- perldata(1) about perl variables

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email