IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Cbor] [cbor-wg/CBORbis] Section 7.1 and IANA considerations. (#196)

Laurence Lundblade <lgl@island-resort.com> Wed, 03 June 2020 18:38 UTC

Return-Path: <lgl@island-resort.com>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA2653A0DDF for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 11:38:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.895
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.895 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8n-brYr28bgA for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 11:38:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p3plsmtpa09-03.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plsmtpa09-03.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [173.201.193.232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C615D3A0DDC for <cbor@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 11:38:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.78] ([76.167.193.86]) by :SMTPAUTH: with ESMTPA id gYH2jJUUU4pcAgYH3jierC; Wed, 03 Jun 2020 11:38:01 -0700
X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=aMSOVo1m c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=t2DvPg6iSvRzsOFYbaV4uQ==:117 a=t2DvPg6iSvRzsOFYbaV4uQ==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=gKmFwSsBAAAA:8 a=oGbIuagOAAAA:20 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=2Tv5k7bOPORSV1WS_zwA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=rKrVYePj7rwA:10 a=nnPW6aIcBuj1ljLj_o6Q:22 a=w1C3t2QeGrPiZgrLijVG:22
X-SECURESERVER-ACCT: lgl@island-resort.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
From: Laurence Lundblade <lgl@island-resort.com>
In-Reply-To: <5C2C810C-FE93-4E32-9FD9-A685F2380629@tzi.org>
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2020 11:38:00 -0700
Cc: cbor@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <9996BD7E-1E2C-4CAA-AC8D-3261DF4EC74B@island-resort.com>
References: <cbor-wg/CBORbis/pull/196@github.com> <5C2C810C-FE93-4E32-9FD9-A685F2380629@tzi.org>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfDnYCeh34T/BGtI81Hok2xuwbSWJQMKOBfXmUpcghVDtqmo9fxK2uCRmQO2Gi6MhnauN5U7K0S8zi4ti6MJPG5GAQ5dxwE5vGVLh+e7ozN/kBrEa2arT qpSqIHH0AK2SwUUNHNDwsdz2LpHYjli6KpM5WXxqlQvwaIe99fGqrKkuyPnbdbJ2HMubU0EFO6gJ5A==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/EOlEoNvNmB9E4-Q8YZIn2zM8f2M>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] [cbor-wg/CBORbis] Section 7.1 and IANA considerations. (#196)
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2020 18:38:03 -0000

Was thinking the space for specification required was too small myself the other day. Looks like no conflict with existing registrations. So yes.

LL 


> On Jun 3, 2020, at 7:25 AM, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
> 
> I just submitted a pull request that addresses some comments on Section 7.1, extension points.
> I used the occasion to pick up the idea to move the lower half of the 1+2 tag space (256 to 32767) to specification required.
> 
> Comments on this?
> 
>> You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
>> 
>>  https://github.com/cbor-wg/CBORbis/pull/196
> 
> Grüße, Carsten
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CBOR mailing list
> CBOR@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email