IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Cbor] MORE control operators (Re: [core] CDDL Model for YANG-SID (draft-ietf-core-sid))

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Sat, 25 February 2023 23:23 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40CCBC151539 for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 Feb 2023 15:23:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.197
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.197 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id du5dQ7bUw-Cc for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 Feb 2023 15:23:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:32::15]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCFCAC14EB1A for <cbor@ietf.org>; Sat, 25 Feb 2023 15:23:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.217.124] (p548dc9a4.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.201.164]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4PPN9h4XFNzDCbT; Sun, 26 Feb 2023 00:23:36 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <FF048123-7AC9-4F6D-8F72-1DD17E40BAF8@tzi.org>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2023 00:23:38 +0100
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 699060218.459868-257633eb52a40d120f1ed127a874ab03
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C0C97958-0185-4849-AF65-78CD0946C69E@tzi.org>
References: <FF048123-7AC9-4F6D-8F72-1DD17E40BAF8@tzi.org>
To: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/NGHlg9Ry-HQjotbFNxWUgqeRh24>
Subject: [Cbor] MORE control operators (Re: [core] CDDL Model for YANG-SID (draft-ietf-core-sid))
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2023 23:23:45 -0000

On 2023-02-24, at 21:14, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
> 
> [1]: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-bormann-cbor-rfc-cddl-models-00.html

As you might have noticed from the other thread, I just put in a -01 that also includes RFC 8366:

https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-bormann-cbor-rfc-cddl-models-01.html

Several encounters with describing YANG-JSON-based data in CDDL have made clear that we need a few more control operators for CDDL, so I started a follow-on to RFC 9165:

https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-bormann-cbor-cddl-more-control-00.html

Enjoy…

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email