Re: [Cbor] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-cbor-date-tag-06: (with COMMENT)
Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Thu, 03 September 2020 09:06 UTC
Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB9293A0CB4; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 02:06:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jLaCnLT3_Cg1; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 02:06:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 301613A0C54; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 02:06:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.102] (p5089ae91.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.137.174.145]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Bhw0J5c2GzyTG; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 11:06:24 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.1\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <159912383150.30053.12358343264824826318@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2020 11:06:24 +0200
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-cbor-date-tag@ietf.org, cbor@ietf.org, CBOR Working Group <cbor-chairs@ietf.org>, francesca.palombini@ericsson.com
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 620816784.363367-11df08b1bf72a40d8153c321d956e1c9
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <566723EF-5D64-4E0A-87DA-037E3654A06A@tzi.org>
References: <159912383150.30053.12358343264824826318@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/RP4LqV2pjPxRoun0--WhmR2_0ic>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-cbor-date-tag-06: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2020 09:06:29 -0000
On 2020-09-03, at 11:03, Robert Wilton via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote: > > I find the wording of "unsigned or negative" to be slightly jarring, presumably > written this way to include 0 in the set of allowed values. Well, these are the two component major types we have in CBOR (0 for unsigned, 1 for negative) that together are used to span the integers, so I think we should stick with the established terminology. Grüße, Carsten
- [Cbor] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf… Robert Wilton via Datatracker
- Re: [Cbor] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Cbor] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-… Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- Re: [Cbor] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-… Mike Jones
- Re: [Cbor] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Cbor] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-… Rob Wilton (rwilton)