IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Cbor] Diagnostic notation file extension

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Thu, 20 April 2023 14:09 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CCB1C14CF18 for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 07:09:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.396
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.396 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ipll0iksGlHk for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 07:09:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C84FC1522DD for <cbor@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 07:09:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EDB33898E for <cbor@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 10:26:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id s747F4D-rXMD for <cbor@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 10:26:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (unknown [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2:40a:34ff:fe10:f571]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4432F3898C for <cbor@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 10:26:36 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1682000796; bh=y8U67IwhPlGnEZNgzAXWWydpRvm073cp2kUVXnbZAzA=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=VgxsTwh7xapnqtRGq0O8y7eoEVgNHDi8vM+ru0tigRT9wSAnuVANlwpNJ7zpkFVEa hlqK4uWnp1Zwwaoa0W0zpp1SjVRK7xF4z5IRtCDRMBGUOhXu+8OuECJzhE98g/svsM zx7pyL8H89L+RI9spNFT5r7UR3OJP3R73AYeOX35DHM1bUUe0R5kZlp4hXs0Q1zrCE xtOKWCSKlyAAC/fjmo2R93oGgzJKpbrdizNF8In1TwD9F3/JBuToSQ5hAIAWsNEoti Oob2MQxipwIaBW4Vv+r2kaChAU2i2TCuUqAM+2kOjnjsnJDUAU1EsokUMDFZ7KioRr CkyHRIf7nAsUw==
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id C80C91DC for <cbor@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 10:09:03 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: cbor@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <44676B11-DF07-453C-A185-A3F04AA03A21@tzi.org>
References: <dcf56d68-b56f-a74f-6065-f6a0e084c112@gmail.com> <3E51B8F4-540D-45F4-B034-E095F8372688@tzi.org> <ca34a921-7009-629c-0145-fca4d3436cc2@gmail.com> <30CC7628-724D-4243-AB76-C0E7540D2321@tzi.org> <ed3fce32-2cc0-71ff-90f3-5c4dcdf20e4d@gmail.com> <44676B11-DF07-453C-A185-A3F04AA03A21@tzi.org>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 27.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2023 10:09:03 -0400
Message-ID: <12546.1681999743@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/RgqNb846u80gqOCP3n7GyoNWhNE>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] Diagnostic notation file extension
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2023 14:09:50 -0000

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
    >> Apparently the issue is (more or less) resolved.  I actually thought
    >> of '.diag' but rejected it as it isn't particularly "CBOR-ish".  If
    >> there is no other claimant, I suggest we go for it.

    > +1

    >> Is this a problem? http://dotwhat.net/file/extension/diag/6786

    > I think the domains of chemical modeling and CBOR diagnostics are separated well enough.

What?  but rfc1437 has proven undeployable due to lack of efficient encoding...!!!

Myself, I would go for something like .dicb or .cdiag or .cbag...
But, I don't object to .diag in the end, I'm just saddened by lack of creativity.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email