IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Cbor] I-D Action: draft-bormann-cbor-cddl-more-control-01.txt

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Thu, 09 March 2023 22:22 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F220CC16B5A4 for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Mar 2023 14:22:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.196
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.196 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Jes5149vj6WF for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Mar 2023 14:21:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.15]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EC55C1522BD for <cbor@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Mar 2023 14:21:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.217.124] (p548dc9a4.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.201.164]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4PXkF06g0HzDCbP; Thu, 9 Mar 2023 23:21:56 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <006ED459-ED2D-4437-A4BB-969891F45644@tzi.org>
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2023 23:21:56 +0100
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 700093316.448478-ab35f62cb0d9b556c256712efc2a798b
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F10CB052-E617-4954-886D-88E2FFFB00F6@tzi.org>
References: <167839422413.3628.12784979681577581802@ietfa.amsl.com> <006ED459-ED2D-4437-A4BB-969891F45644@tzi.org>
To: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/h5yoRHBJlJj0ZucRDmT67DYFAUk>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] I-D Action: draft-bormann-cbor-cddl-more-control-01.txt
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2023 22:22:02 -0000

On 2023-03-09, at 21:41, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
> 
> I haven't managed to implement all of these additions in the cddl tool

0.10.3.  As usual:

   gem update cddl

Please provide feedback when you have been trying this new functionality.

Now, should it be .cborseqdet or .cbordetseq?
My brain was playing me some tricks while typing the code for the tool.
Maybe -01 [1] is wrong here?

Grüße, Carsten

[1]: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-bormann-cbor-cddl-more-control-01.html#name-deterministic-encoding

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email