IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Cbor] Reminder and call for agenda: CBOR WG Virtual Meeting on 2022-06-01

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Tue, 31 May 2022 19:19 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB5F9C157B5B for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 May 2022 12:19:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QiCtk9b6cJbU for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 May 2022 12:19:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.15]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A454C15AAFF for <cbor@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 May 2022 12:19:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (p5089ad4f.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.137.173.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4LCMXj2hMGzDCbw; Tue, 31 May 2022 21:19:33 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.100.31\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJJjSHT2q_wpZQ9QFhLSxGuhffWwb=9P1XDUFTsheOvPZA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2022 21:19:32 +0200
Cc: cbor@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5A9B396E-1D9F-455C-949F-9B4C89AA510C@tzi.org>
References: <CALaySJLPtUjdfVss17noK=18RyczpcCGNu=im8CBpiQz=WiLWA@mail.gmail.com> <CALaySJKUNh-AkJa87sCDpzf9OHV8H367VQyzyozXCCXxphUARw@mail.gmail.com> <CALaySJ+P2sP7BU7bNSxRJBByyp04rzVZuukq_e+9wbb5WPRSFQ@mail.gmail.com> <CALaySJKxht1gd1+3mNiAH-kLUAxjdPPk3doK50C_xS74LG+YTQ@mail.gmail.com> <CALaySJJjSHT2q_wpZQ9QFhLSxGuhffWwb=9P1XDUFTsheOvPZA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.100.31)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/ivLfhVw0G1eMVd3VTPNx2qTKR90>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] Reminder and call for agenda: CBOR WG Virtual Meeting on 2022-06-01
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2022 19:19:45 -0000

Hi Barry,

On 31. May 2022, at 15:42, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote:
> 
> If not... is it worth having the call for just that
> one item? Carsten, is there enough to discuss about Packed to make it
> alone worth the call?

The answer to that question depends a lot on how much you care about cbor-packed…

Maybe we can cancel the WG meeting and instead use the timeslot for some hallway discussion between interested people about cbor-packed.

We had some interesting conclusions last time, and I have started writing them up (and implementing them), but we probably won’t have a full implementation at hand tomorrow.  So it will be mostly slideware, but maybe it is good vetting that before completing the implementation and writeup (and then deciding on the WG direction).

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email