[Cbor] draft-ietf-cbor-tags-oid-02 (Re: Going forward on draft-ietf-cbor-tags-oid-01.txt)

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Wed, 28 October 2020 17:50 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01EA03A0A66 for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 10:50:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.912
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FSL_BULK_SIG=0.001, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100=1.886, RAZOR2_CHECK=0.922, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wdPbseeLowTF for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 10:50:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EDE33A0924 for <cbor@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 10:50:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from client-0045.vpn.uni-bremen.de (client-0045.vpn.uni-bremen.de []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4CLx132KjszyX1; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 18:49:59 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <FB5123AF-6651-4F62-8285-0FE73D4F5686@tzi.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 18:49:58 +0100
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 625600198.855976-fc97eae120f15af41bfe12b8462a5464
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <60607D68-D883-4E90-BDD0-EE6C1C1097F6@tzi.org>
References: <160149084739.1101.17252607624012498913@ietfa.amsl.com> <FB5123AF-6651-4F62-8285-0FE73D4F5686@tzi.org>
To: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/yuGQFDUeB1YHSa8H4LjiW6wqii4>
Subject: [Cbor] draft-ietf-cbor-tags-oid-02 (Re: Going forward on draft-ietf-cbor-tags-oid-01.txt)
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 17:50:04 -0000

On 2020-10-28, at 13:34, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
> What is left to do is:
> — tick off and delete the yellow editors’ comment at the end of Section 5:
> https://raw.githack.com/cbor-wg/cbor-oid/master/draft-ietf-cbor-tags-oid.html#name-tag-factoring-with-oid-arra — i.e., agree that we now have reached the right level of complexity here.
> — discuss whether we need the detail in https://raw.githack.com/cbor-wg/cbor-oid/master/draft-ietf-cbor-tags-oid.html#section-9.1 — conversion between BER and dotted decimal is not exactly the focus of this draft any longer, and the third paragraph of Section 9 (https://raw.githack.com/cbor-wg/cbor-oid/master/draft-ietf-cbor-tags-oid.html#section-9-3) already contains a good warning about this.
> We could discuss this later today in the interim, generate a -02 with the above (and a few editorial) changes, and go for WGLC (which should get us any further reviews we need).

We did this, and based on the discussion I have now submitted -02:

Name:		draft-ietf-cbor-tags-oid
Revision:	02
Title:		Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR) Tags for Object Identifiers
Document date:	2020-10-28
Group:		cbor
Pages:		14
URL:            https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-cbor-tags-oid-02.txt
Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cbor-tags-oid/
Html:           https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-cbor-tags-oid-02.html
Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-cbor-tags-oid-02
Diff:           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-cbor-tags-oid-02

This should be ready for WGLC now, potentially discussion results of that at the IETF 109 meeting.

In the interim today, Ira mentioned that SACM and RATS might be good WGs to make aware of a WGLC, as a good collection of people who know about ASN.1 Object Identifiers is assembled there.

Grüße, Carsten