[Cbor] draft-ietf-cbor-tags-oid-02 (Re: Going forward on draft-ietf-cbor-tags-oid-01.txt)

[Carsten Bormann <[e-mail]>]

On 2020-10-28, at 13:34, Carsten Bormann <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> What is left to do is:
> 
> — tick off and delete the yellow editors’ comment at the end of Section 5:
> https://raw.githack.com/cbor-wg/cbor-oid/master/draft-ietf-cbor-tags-oid.html#name-tag-factoring-with-oid-arra — i.e., agree that we now have reached the right level of complexity here.
> — discuss whether we need the detail in https://raw.githack.com/cbor-wg/cbor-oid/master/draft-ietf-cbor-tags-oid.html#section-9.1 — conversion between BER and dotted decimal is not exactly the focus of this draft any longer, and the third paragraph of Section 9 (https://raw.githack.com/cbor-wg/cbor-oid/master/draft-ietf-cbor-tags-oid.html#section-9-3) already contains a good warning about this.
> 
> We could discuss this later today in the interim, generate a -02 with the above (and a few editorial) changes, and go for WGLC (which should get us any further reviews we need).

We did this, and based on the discussion I have now submitted -02:

Name:		draft-ietf-cbor-tags-oid
Revision:	02
Title:		Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR) Tags for Object Identifiers
Document date:	2020-10-28
Group:		cbor
Pages:		14
URL:            https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-cbor-tags-oid-02.txt
Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cbor-tags-oid/
Html:           https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-cbor-tags-oid-02.html
Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-cbor-tags-oid-02
Diff:           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-cbor-tags-oid-02

This should be ready for WGLC now, potentially discussion results of that at the IETF 109 meeting.

In the interim today, Ira mentioned that SACM and RATS might be good WGs to make aware of a WGLC, as a good collection of people who know about ASN.1 Object Identifiers is assembled there.

Grüße, Carsten