[Cbor] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on charter-ietf-cbor-01-01: (with COMMENT)
Alvaro Retana via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 25 June 2019 16:25 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietf.org
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D0BD120401; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 09:25:24 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Alvaro Retana via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: cbor-chairs@ietf.org, cbor@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.98.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <156147992423.31177.7055113333809228268.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 09:25:24 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/zMuDCRI86q9gSgTJY6kNiflzg8E>
Subject: [Cbor] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on charter-ietf-cbor-01-01: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 16:25:25 -0000
Alvaro Retana has entered the following ballot position for charter-ietf-cbor-01-01: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-cbor/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I have a couple of editorial suggestions: (1) The charter talks about "using a DISPATCH like process". While most people might have an idea of what that is, I think mentioning it is not necessary. (2) The first category is: General purpose specifications that are expected to have broad usage: The working group will normally adopt and publish such proposals. Examples of proposals in this category are CBOR Sequence media type (draft-bormann-cbor-sequence) and Error Indications tag (draft-richter-cbor-error-tag). It would be nice if the examples of WG adoption were adopted documents. I think the description is enough -- let the WG decide if these are this type of documents. (3) Similarly, in the third category... "An example of this might be portions of draft-bormann-cbor-tags-oid..." The tentative language is not great, even for an example.
- [Cbor] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on charter-ie… Alvaro Retana via Datatracker
- Re: [Cbor] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on charte… Barry Leiba
- Re: [Cbor] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on charte… Alvaro Retana
- Re: [Cbor] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on charte… Burt Harris