[CCAMP] 答复: WG adoption poll on draft-mwdt-ccamp-fmwk

[Fatai Zhang <[e-mail]>]

Hi Manuel and Luis,

Thanks for your suggestion.

I agree that the coordination with other SDOs is very important.

CCAMP has good coordination with ITU-T SG15 and I think we can follow the same approach with other SDOs.





Thanks

Fatai

·¢¼þÈË: LUIS MIGUEL CONTRERAS MURILLO [mailto:[e-mail]]
·¢ËÍʱ¼ä: 2016Äê12ÔÂ16ÈÕ 2:33
ÊÕ¼þÈË: Fatai Zhang; [e-mail]
³­ËÍ: [e-mail]
Ö÷Ìâ: RE: WG adoption poll on draft-mwdt-ccamp-fmwk

Hi all,

Yes / support (as co-author)

I fully agree with Manuel¡¯s perspective on avoiding fragmentation, key target for operators. We should not reinvent the wheel, especially when it is demonstrated the validity, viability, and wide support of the existing work e.g., in the ONF. For future steps we should ensure that follow what is explicitly stated on this framework document about addressing gaps, avoiding inefficient overlapping.

For that, the coordination mentioned by Manuel seems to be key.

Best regards

Luis


De: CCAMP [mailto:[e-mail]] En nombre de [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
Enviado el: jueves, 15 de diciembre de 2016 18:00
Para: [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>; [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
Asunto: Re: [CCAMP] WG adoption poll on draft-mwdt-ccamp-fmwk

Support ¨C but, I see an important purpose ("mission") of this draft in helping to sort out if, and to what extent, MW modeling work proposed in CCAMP might overlap with Microwave/Millimeterwave Interface modelling work already ongoing in the industry.

As mentioned in the draft, ONF has specified a MW information model, driven by operator uses cases, which is also sustained by proof-of-concept implementation/validation of the specifications in an open and collaborative approach.

From other technology domains (e.g. OTN, DWDM), it is my understanding that CCAMP develops specifications on basis of and in reference to existing (protocol neutral) information models and doesn¡¯t start blank sheet with (technology-specific) data models or control plane extensions for non-IETF defined data plane technologies.

If CCAMP decided to adopt this draft, there should be coordination with ONF, incl. the relationship to, dependency between, and use of the ONF MW information model. This will be of key importance to avoid complexity and industry fragmentation (i.e. a disservice to the industry) going forward.

Thanks,
Manuel

From: CCAMP [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Fatai Zhang
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2016 11:01 AM
To: 'CCAMP'
Subject: [CCAMP] WG adoption poll on draft-mwdt-ccamp-fmwk

Hi all,

This starts a two weeks poll on making [draft-mwdt-ccamp-fmwk-00] a CCAMP working group document.


Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not support".

If indicating no, please state your reservations with the document. If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the document is a WG document.

Please note that no IPR was disclosed against this document currently.

The poll ends on Friday December 16th.

Thanks
Fatai & Daniele