IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [CCAMP] WG adoption poll on draft-mwdt-ccamp-fmwk

LUIS MIGUEL CONTRERAS MURILLO <luismiguel.contrerasmurillo@telefonica.com> Thu, 15 December 2016 18:33 UTC

Return-Path: <luismiguel.contrerasmurillo@telefonica.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CB67129958 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 10:33:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D0kJpfU7uGx2 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 10:33:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from EUR01-HE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-he1eur01on0110.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.0.110]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3EE6129BAF for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 10:33:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from AM3PR06MB1379.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.163.187.13) by AM3PR06MB1378.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.163.187.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.771.8; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 18:33:16 +0000
Received: from AM3PR06MB1379.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::905a:4bc1:d537:7d06]) by AM3PR06MB1379.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::905a:4bc1:d537:7d06%14]) with mapi id 15.01.0771.014; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 18:33:16 +0000
From: LUIS MIGUEL CONTRERAS MURILLO <luismiguel.contrerasmurillo@telefonica.com>
To: "zhangfatai@huawei.com" <zhangfatai@huawei.com>, "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: WG adoption poll on draft-mwdt-ccamp-fmwk
Thread-Index: AdJMgwLlREAe2xjrSc2YnpyqJ2k9igKaYdkgAASvCcA=
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 18:33:16 +0000
Message-ID: <AM3PR06MB1379E656C9905E6957A590469E9D0@AM3PR06MB1379.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
References: <F82A4B6D50F9464B8EBA55651F541CF8AAB1DBF1@SZXEMA504-MBS.china.huawei.com> <46b031dc16ed4283ba4a4516ffa436d8@HE101865.emea1.cds.t-internal.com>
In-Reply-To: <46b031dc16ed4283ba4a4516ffa436d8@HE101865.emea1.cds.t-internal.com>
Accept-Language: es-ES, en-US
Content-Language: es-ES
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=luismiguel.contrerasmurillo@telefonica.com;
x-originating-ip: [195.235.92.36]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: fd668508-569b-45ef-3787-08d42518d603
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(22001);SRVR:AM3PR06MB1378;
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; AM3PR06MB1378; 7:v5hsM2T/0G9MaogCiALo7qnlOSQosSeIM8tCL/fMWRlsc15K3H7yN6Hgx6alGwCMN7mTvFdW1Ye4J1LIbhrOdURWie7A2/oWR1hNWRbM8fpbKI3SfLtwr7bEBRIVgYxnpE2AmqUg9xfXK8NZOtcO6VM5L5y0zQgxX5FPGI9wlvCfHLlPCctNtr5Jo6XI1zci3VUrFm6xuBiVo3p+b/7IghyO3boVVKZu9hZcDtND3aEFXm3IBfGrBzFpj1WNM+YkUt7at6BcmDYlDTYqoYV2bN2bcL+eAvynMX7SVZNPgZIf5E8XnXjwUlxmJDi93Pr8q2bdbAT+YjZkAgQ1JhVjP05v+3Gnmvzpuzx44xqUcGdmAm/S5jrTBpUmpIyCGRUyqCfGEw2JRwiVUp7/1NaW3oyx3QT/4suAEioB37MOdZ7hdywgvTdU06lg6Xcv8UD7Sj8uXAIwfDHZewt8Iw/ncA==
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <AM3PR06MB1378B57F84B1A46DA76441AC9E9D0@AM3PR06MB1378.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(50582790962513)(21748063052155);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040375)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001)(10201501046)(6055026)(6041248)(20161123564025)(20161123558021)(20161123562025)(20161123555025)(20161123560025)(6072148); SRVR:AM3PR06MB1378; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:AM3PR06MB1378;
x-forefront-prvs: 0157DEB61B
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(7916002)(39410400002)(39850400002)(39450400003)(39840400002)(39860400002)(189002)(377454003)(53754006)(199003)(4326007)(790700001)(2906002)(86362001)(2950100002)(66066001)(6116002)(68736007)(81156014)(9686002)(6436002)(81166006)(102836003)(5250100002)(5660300001)(8936002)(8676002)(3846002)(2501003)(7696004)(76176999)(5001770100001)(229853002)(2900100001)(74316002)(230783001)(101416001)(7736002)(105586002)(38730400001)(97736004)(76576001)(3280700002)(3660700001)(54356999)(189998001)(33656002)(50986999)(106356001)(92566002)(6506006)(9010500006)(19627235001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:AM3PR06MB1378; H:AM3PR06MB1379.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: telefonica.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_AM3PR06MB1379E656C9905E6957A590469E9D0AM3PR06MB1379eurp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: telefonica.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 15 Dec 2016 18:33:16.3378 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 9744600e-3e04-492e-baa1-25ec245c6f10
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM3PR06MB1378
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/-dcK2pww93NVT9v3iV_49YlxGNs>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] WG adoption poll on draft-mwdt-ccamp-fmwk
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 18:33:24 -0000

Hi all,

Yes / support (as co-author)

I fully agree with Manuel's perspective on avoiding fragmentation, key target for operators. We should not reinvent the wheel, especially when it is demonstrated the validity, viability, and wide support of the existing work e.g., in the ONF. For future steps we should ensure that follow what is explicitly stated on this framework document about addressing gaps, avoiding inefficient overlapping.

For that, the coordination mentioned by Manuel seems to be key.

Best regards

Luis


De: CCAMP [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] En nombre de Manuel.Paul@telekom.de
Enviado el: jueves, 15 de diciembre de 2016 18:00
Para: zhangfatai@huawei.com; ccamp@ietf.org
Asunto: Re: [CCAMP] WG adoption poll on draft-mwdt-ccamp-fmwk

Support - but, I see an important purpose ("mission") of this draft in helping to sort out if, and to what extent, MW modeling work proposed in CCAMP might overlap with Microwave/Millimeterwave Interface modelling work already ongoing in the industry.

As mentioned in the draft, ONF has specified a MW information model, driven by operator uses cases, which is also sustained by proof-of-concept implementation/validation of the specifications in an open and collaborative approach.

>From other technology domains (e.g. OTN, DWDM), it is my understanding that CCAMP develops specifications on basis of and in reference to existing (protocol neutral) information models and doesn't start blank sheet with (technology-specific) data models or control plane extensions for non-IETF defined data plane technologies.

If CCAMP decided to adopt this draft, there should be coordination with ONF, incl. the relationship to, dependency between, and use of the ONF MW information model. This will be of key importance to avoid complexity and industry fragmentation (i.e. a disservice to the industry) going forward.

Thanks,
Manuel

From: CCAMP [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Fatai Zhang
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2016 11:01 AM
To: 'CCAMP'
Subject: [CCAMP] WG adoption poll on draft-mwdt-ccamp-fmwk

Hi all,

This starts a two weeks poll on making [draft-mwdt-ccamp-fmwk-00] a CCAMP working group document.


Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not support".

If indicating no, please state your reservations with the document. If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the document is a WG document.

Please note that no IPR was disclosed against this document currently.

The poll ends on Friday December 16th.

Thanks
Fatai & Daniele

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email