Re: [CCAMP] Regarding IPR on draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Wed, 23 July 2014 20:25 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DF121B2910 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 13:25:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id exj02NaYMaDx for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 13:25:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp5.iomartmail.com (asmtp5.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.176]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0D221B2822 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 13:25:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp5.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp5.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s6NKP8aa017502; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 21:25:08 +0100
Received: from 950129200 (dhcp-b3fb.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.179.251]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp5.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s6NKP2BP017479 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 23 Jul 2014 21:25:04 +0100
From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: "'Lou Berger'" <lberger@labn.net>
References: <53CFA132.40807@labn.net> <105d01cfa67f$a9b320e0$fd1962a0$@olddog.co.uk> <53CFF3EE.6060704@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <53CFF3EE.6060704@labn.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 21:25:06 +0100
Message-ID: <129001cfa6b4$331a4f00$994eed00$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQEyWzCsfre33/NrPc+YvrA9ysYiOAFLrFryAhkxnSSczYm1sA==
Content-Language: en-gb
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.1.0.1576-7.5.0.1018-20836.002
X-TM-AS-Result: No--22.906-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--22.906-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: WMT2WRIkHPNdpLkh5p97g/zu9Lw9C7fA8GRhP/nTHNbD3h2nmZ4BQeu/ ECyhLxqOau/OBb09XPsMo1U+ogv8V10U3RPW+iLPFUNRozODPxhqTX06kzHrl99RlPzeVuQQMBt iyJQFGD5xLsht+SbvNPFPDHhQkgxyMA8bs51X9/naize54oCwVFY5BBJri9sdtXl9IxEPXOqtEa JoVjyWkHnlvzhRXao32E7x9GZo7QkOwH4pD14DsJpWgCLYjjT9fkuZtv/FS5qdI/DikZ1UPHiCe 8dVoQXovdx9Sox4uW3npaBaoP7oRPL41OcGi0pOe7MO8jvmPSxpeZ1cXZibx8Xt25YNeIUSZ3KR kLO0vRkwwVGIprj9L84WYLmQfXYmnJra0Su7THtxPA6arkYp0B9fNWA7SFWq5Jdw/cP0HM+SkJb MheHNAW+/reE7JvSyhtfOGOSyK2lNfs8n85Te8v7E6GNqs6ceseWplitmp0j6C0ePs7A07QKmAR N5PTKc
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/0ufBp4txhCClNKRqapi7Uzu44sc
Cc: draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange@tools.ietf.org, 'CCAMP' <ccamp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Regarding IPR on draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 20:25:15 -0000

Hi,

This document describes many ways of building networks based on existing tools
and protocols. One might even say it encourages the use of some tools and
protocols. I do not intend to look at each such tool and protocol to work out
whether I know about IPR that has already been disclosed and logged in the data
tracker (which would be how I know about it). Hence my answer.

Perhaps a more helpful answer would be...

I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft that has not already been
disclosed to the IETF.

Ciao,
Adrian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lou Berger [mailto:lberger@labn.net]
> Sent: 23 July 2014 18:42
> To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
> Cc: draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange@tools.ietf.org; 'BRUNGARD,
> DEBORAH A (ATTLABS)'; 'CCAMP'
> Subject: Re: Regarding IPR on draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange
> 
> Adrian,
>     I'm sure I'm being pedantic, but I'm not sure if there's some
> subtlety I'm missing.  Are you saying
> (a)   "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" or (b)
> or "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft" (but doesn't
> "directly impact" content...)
> 
> - please choose (A) or (B).
> 
> Thanks...
> 
> Lou
> 
> 
> On 7/23/2014 10:09 AM, Adrian Farrel wrote:
> > Hi Lou,
> >
> > I am not aware of any IPR that directly impacts on the content of this
> document.
> >
> > Adrian
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Lou Berger [mailto:lberger@labn.net]
> >> Sent: 23 July 2014 12:49
> >> To: draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange@tools.ietf.org; BRUNGARD,
> >> DEBORAH A (ATTLABS)
> >> Cc: CCAMP
> >> Subject: Regarding IPR on draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange
> >>
> >>
> >> Authors, Contributors, (CCAMP)
> >>
> >> As part of the preparation for WG document adoption poll:
> >>
> >> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?
> >>
> >>   Please state either:
> >>
> >>   "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
> >>   or
> >>   "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
> >>
> >> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> >> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?
> >>
> >> If yes to the above, please state either:
> >>
> >>   "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
> >>   or
> >>   "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
> >>
> >> If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
> >>   appropriate.
> >>
> >> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
> >> above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
> >> aware of any relevant IPR.  This document will not advance to the next
> >> stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
> >> contributor.  NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THE DOCUMENT.
> >>
> >> If you are on the CCAMP WG email list but are not listed as an author or
> >> contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF IPR rules
> >> which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of
> >> others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in any
> >>  contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR.  For more
> >> information, please see the RFCs listed above and
> >> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.
> >>
> >> Thank you,
> >> CCAMP WG Chairs
> >>
> >> PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
> >> response.
> >