Re: [CCAMP] Regarding IPR on draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange

["Adrian Farrel" <[e-mail]>]

Hi,

This document describes many ways of building networks based on existing tools
and protocols. One might even say it encourages the use of some tools and
protocols. I do not intend to look at each such tool and protocol to work out
whether I know about IPR that has already been disclosed and logged in the data
tracker (which would be how I know about it). Hence my answer.

Perhaps a more helpful answer would be...

I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft that has not already been
disclosed to the IETF.

Ciao,
Adrian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lou Berger [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Sent: 23 July 2014 18:42
> To: [e-mail]
> Cc: [e-mail]; 'BRUNGARD,
> DEBORAH A (ATTLABS)'; 'CCAMP'
> Subject: Re: Regarding IPR on draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange
> 
> Adrian,
>     I'm sure I'm being pedantic, but I'm not sure if there's some
> subtlety I'm missing.  Are you saying
> (a)   "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" or (b)
> or "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft" (but doesn't
> "directly impact" content...)
> 
> - please choose (A) or (B).
> 
> Thanks...
> 
> Lou
> 
> 
> On 7/23/2014 10:09 AM, Adrian Farrel wrote:
> > Hi Lou,
> >
> > I am not aware of any IPR that directly impacts on the content of this
> document.
> >
> > Adrian
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Lou Berger [mailto:[e-mail]]
> >> Sent: 23 July 2014 12:49
> >> To: [e-mail]; BRUNGARD,
> >> DEBORAH A (ATTLABS)
> >> Cc: CCAMP
> >> Subject: Regarding IPR on draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange
> >>
> >>
> >> Authors, Contributors, (CCAMP)
> >>
> >> As part of the preparation for WG document adoption poll:
> >>
> >> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?
> >>
> >>   Please state either:
> >>
> >>   "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
> >>   or
> >>   "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
> >>
> >> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> >> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?
> >>
> >> If yes to the above, please state either:
> >>
> >>   "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
> >>   or
> >>   "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
> >>
> >> If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
> >>   appropriate.
> >>
> >> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
> >> above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
> >> aware of any relevant IPR.  This document will not advance to the next
> >> stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
> >> contributor.  NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THE DOCUMENT.
> >>
> >> If you are on the CCAMP WG email list but are not listed as an author or
> >> contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF IPR rules
> >> which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of
> >> others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in any
> >>  contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR.  For more
> >> information, please see the RFCs listed above and
> >> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.
> >>
> >> Thank you,
> >> CCAMP WG Chairs
> >>
> >> PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
> >> response.
> >