Re: [CCAMP] Regarding IPR on draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Wed, 23 July 2014 17:42 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E63761B2BBD for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 10:42:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jwZbiLgH2-vn for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 10:42:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gproxy7-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy7-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [70.40.196.235]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 4222D1B2A32 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 10:42:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 26434 invoked by uid 0); 23 Jul 2014 17:42:03 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO cmgw4) (10.0.90.85) by gproxy7.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 23 Jul 2014 17:42:03 -0000
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by cmgw4 with id Vzhs1o00h2SSUrH01zhvQp; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 17:42:01 -0600
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=OcELUHjY c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=WrhVjQHxoPwA:10 a=U6qwPQrzJV4A:10 a=HFCU6gKsb0MA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=wU2YTnxGAAAA:8 a=cNaOj0WVAAAA:8 a=-NfooI8aBGcA:10 a=uEJ9t1CZtbIA:10 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=ws5xTUjv_-hjrCfWwAgA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=33rK67OTR_gA:10
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=DDH0wPqOoQgKtepKIcVWFRr21eWifDrwj0hN/0Lnp9U=; b=dChv4B5y1WjE5HTbvY4sCA3zLI9lXo0iT5mrVSb+Qe8DSfIMIusm9wISxAFHdnz877wG9+i8fnnHhzdU7ssxif9qc9cdkRFstYCP3c06XmSfacI0Hn1rk+ceIFqJ9+Za;
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]:35755 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1XA0Y5-0001dw-Na; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 11:41:53 -0600
Message-ID: <53CFF3EE.6060704@labn.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 13:42:06 -0400
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
References: <53CFA132.40807@labn.net> <105d01cfa67f$a9b320e0$fd1962a0$@olddog.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <105d01cfa67f$a9b320e0$fd1962a0$@olddog.co.uk>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth 69.89.31.113 authed with lberger@labn.net}
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/pujaBP4hWTnsfnWFLY9MrtozsjE
Cc: draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange@tools.ietf.org, 'CCAMP' <ccamp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Regarding IPR on draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 17:42:15 -0000

Adrian,
    I'm sure I'm being pedantic, but I'm not sure if there's some
subtlety I'm missing.  Are you saying
(a)   "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" or (b) 
or "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft" (but doesn't
"directly impact" content...)

- please choose (A) or (B).

Thanks...

Lou


On 7/23/2014 10:09 AM, Adrian Farrel wrote:
> Hi Lou,
>
> I am not aware of any IPR that directly impacts on the content of this document.
>
> Adrian
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Lou Berger [mailto:lberger@labn.net]
>> Sent: 23 July 2014 12:49
>> To: draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange@tools.ietf.org; BRUNGARD,
>> DEBORAH A (ATTLABS)
>> Cc: CCAMP
>> Subject: Regarding IPR on draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange
>>
>>
>> Authors, Contributors, (CCAMP)
>>
>> As part of the preparation for WG document adoption poll:
>>
>> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?
>>
>>   Please state either:
>>
>>   "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
>>   or
>>   "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
>>
>> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
>> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?
>>
>> If yes to the above, please state either:
>>
>>   "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
>>   or
>>   "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
>>
>> If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
>>   appropriate.
>>
>> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
>> above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
>> aware of any relevant IPR.  This document will not advance to the next
>> stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
>> contributor.  NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THE DOCUMENT.
>>
>> If you are on the CCAMP WG email list but are not listed as an author or
>> contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF IPR rules
>> which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of
>> others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in any
>>  contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR.  For more
>> information, please see the RFCs listed above and
>> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.
>>
>> Thank you,
>> CCAMP WG Chairs
>>
>> PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
>> response.
>