[CCAMP] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-ccamp-flexe-yang-cm-02
Ladislav Lhotka via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 14 August 2023 08:49 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0174C151531; Mon, 14 Aug 2023 01:49:07 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ladislav Lhotka via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: yang-doctors@ietf.org
Cc: ccamp@ietf.org, draft-ietf-ccamp-flexe-yang-cm.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 11.7.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <169200294783.29198.10599275810060363083@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Ladislav Lhotka <ladislav.lhotka@nic.cz>
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2023 01:49:07 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/1jXK4vbZG0q6iMmV6gNYwWAcMvs>
Subject: [CCAMP] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-ccamp-flexe-yang-cm-02
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2023 08:49:07 -0000
Reviewer: Ladislav Lhotka Review result: Ready with Issues **** General comments The ietf-flexe module is a relative small YANG module based on an implementation agreed upon by the OIF Forum. From the YANG point of view, the only problem of the module that I found is that all configuration leaves in the "flexe-client" container are mandatory, which eventually makes the top-level container "ietf-flexe:flexe" mandatory. This violates the requirement in sec. 4.10 of RFC 8407: Top-level data node MUST NOT be mandatory. **** Specific comments ***** Section 2 - The list of requirements would be better formatted as a definition list (<dl>) of xml2rfc v3. - A spurious character entity representing Unicode character U+12289 appears at the end of the requirement R-Group-02. ***** Appendices - It would be useful to indicate (at least schematically) that <port-num> leaves are references (leafrefs) to interfaces defined using the ietf-interfaces module.
- [CCAMP] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-iet… Ladislav Lhotka via Datatracker
- Re: [CCAMP] Yangdoctors last call review of draft… wangminxue@chinamobile.com