Re: [CCAMP] Reminder: Request to WG authors/editors (for Atlanta) Fri, 19 October 2012 07:21 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8248C21F85EA; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 00:21:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -97.857
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-97.857 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.538, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4rYWeqXRY3Nt; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 00:21:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8310221F84F8; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 00:21:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from (unknown []) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTP id DBFEC1268A2C; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 15:22:16 +0800 (CST)
Received: from (unknown []) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id E0A3372D5DD; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 15:18:28 +0800 (CST)
Received: from ([]) by with ESMTP id q9J7L9kY047346; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 15:21:09 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from
In-Reply-To: <>
To: Lou Berger <>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-KeepSent: 531BDB02:72EDAE3C-48257A9C:0027732B; type=4; name=$KeepSent
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5.6 March 06, 2007
Message-ID: <>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 15:21:05 +0800
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on notes_smtp/zte_ltd(Release 8.5.3FP1 HF212|May 23, 2012) at 2012-10-19 15:20:50, Serialize complete at 2012-10-19 15:20:50
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 0028641348257A9C_="
X-MAIL: q9J7L9kY047346
Cc: CCAMP <>,
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Reminder: Request to WG authors/editors (for Atlanta)
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 07:21:30 -0000

Hi Lou

For the draft

We will address the open issue about the notify mechanism to handle LSP 
control, hope that we can have an consensus in the WG, then ask for last 

As to the draft, 
we think we have addressed all the comments from the WG, and
hope that the WG will resonsider it to be adopted as a WG document.

Best regards


Lou Berger <> 
2012-10-19 06:19


[CCAMP] Reminder: Request to WG authors/editors (for Atlanta)

Authors of WG documents,
                 As with the last meeting: Please plan to review (present) 
changes that have been recently made to your draft, as well as any
plans for, or open issues with the draft at the upcoming meeting.  If
there have been no recent changes, please present open issues and your
plans for moving the draft forward. If you have not already done so,
please respond to Daniele's agenda request mail to schedule your
presentation time.

If you don't need a full slot for the draft, please be prepared to say a
few words on document status/progress/planned revisions in our first
session.  Alternatively, you can send this information to the WG mail
list prior to the WG meeting.

Much thanks.
Lou (and Deborah)
CCAMP mailing list