WG dcoument status
Kireeti Kompella <kireeti@juniper.net> Mon, 25 February 2002 01:52 UTC
Envelope-to: ccamp-data@psg.com
Delivery-date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 17:52:52 -0800
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 17:52:08 -0800
From: Kireeti Kompella <kireeti@juniper.net>
To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Subject: WG dcoument status
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.10202241656410.11051-100000@kummer.juniper.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Here's a status update. The signaling drafts: draft-ietf-mpls-generalized-cr-ldp-05.txt draft-ietf-mpls-generalized-rsvp-te-06.txt draft-ietf-mpls-generalized-signaling-07.txt draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-sonet-sdh-02.txt have finished WG Last Call, and will be sent on to IETF Last Call. They are on the track for Proposed Standard. Bert Wijnen (AD) has suggested that there should be an implementation statement before these move on to IETF Last Call; the WG chairs and draft editors agreed. One note: the SDH/SONET label issue must be put to rest before the SDH/SONET draft can move forward. All other issues are now closed. The LMP draft: draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-02.txt has gone through one round of WG Last Call comments and, once a new version has been produced incorporating these comments, will go through a final WG Last Call. This is also targeted as a Proposed Standard. The following draft, a companion to the above LMP document, is also targeted at Proposed Standard, and is still being worked on: draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-mib-00.txt The routing drafts: draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-routing-02.txt draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-gmpls-extensions-04.txt are awaiting WG consensus for going into WG Last Call. These are also targeted for Proposed Standard. (Note that the ISIS draft is owned by the ISIS WG.) The following drafts are Informational: draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-architecture-01.txt draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-sonet-sdh-extensions-00.txt They are awaiting final touches from the editor before they progress. The following two documents are also being worked on: draft-ietf-ccamp-oli-reqts-00.txt draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-wdm-00.txt The first is an Informational document; the second is aimed at Proposed Standard. The MIBs are being reworked in response to comments from the AD. When the new versions are ready, the WG will then be asked for consensus to make them WG docs. Kireeti.
- Re: WG dcoument status Kireeti Kompella
- RE: WG dcoument status Kireeti Kompella
- Re: WG dcoument status Jonathan Sadler
- RE: WG dcoument status Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
- Re: WG dcoument status Ben Mack-Crane
- Re: WG dcoument status Jonathan Sadler
- RE: WG dcoument status Osama Aboul-Magd
- RE: WG dcoument status Mannie, Eric
- RE: WG dcoument status Mak, L (Leen)
- Re: WG dcoument status Dimitri.Papadimitriou
- Re: WG dcoument status Stephen Trowbridge
- RE: WG dcoument status Mannie, Eric
- RE: WG dcoument status Vishal Sharma
- RE: WG dcoument status Kireeti Kompella
- RE: WG dcoument status Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
- WG dcoument status Kireeti Kompella
- Re: WG dcoument status Yakov Rekhter
- Re: WG dcoument status Lou Berger
- Re: WG dcoument status Dimitri.Papadimitriou
- RE: WG dcoument status John Drake
- RE: WG dcoument status Lou Berger
- RE: WG dcoument status Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
- Re: WG dcoument status Yakov Rekhter