Re: Multi-Area TE Protocol Extensions

Dimitri.Papadimitriou@alcatel.be Tue, 10 December 2002 21:14 UTC

Envelope-to: ccamp-data@psg.com
Delivery-date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 13:12:21 -0800
Message-ID: <3DF65930.1F1B5188@alcatel.be>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 22:14:24 +0100
From: Dimitri.Papadimitriou@alcatel.be
Organization: Optical Network Architecture (NTA - Antwerpen)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Yakov Rekhter <yakov@juniper.net>
Cc: Jean Philippe Vasseur <jvasseur@cisco.com>, sachin laddha <sachinl@internettrends.co.in>, mpls@UU.NET, ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Re: Multi-Area TE Protocol Extensions
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

yakov, 

i think this i-d provides a fair amount of valuable 
input thus wouldn't be just better to submit an 
updated version (since the registers value should
be updated anyway) also it fits imho in the context 
of the ccamp even more largely than just for ma-te

thanks,
- dimitri.

Yakov Rekhter wrote:
> 
> Dimitri,
> 
> > > this ID does not propose a mechanism to compute inter-area TE path
> >
> > well i would say that either none of them does it, or all of
> > them, more accurately route exclusions are applicable to any
> > mpls network where full computation of the ero is not performed
> > before the LSP is signaled, implying thus a "scope" for computed
> > path thus among other applicable to multiple areas - nevertheless
> > i agree that a next version of this i-d should probably include
> > an applicability section covering this in a bit more details (see
> > also section 4.1 for an example -
> >
> > this said and as for any other input or i-d provided on constraint-
> > passing (as well as path query, btw) lot of work is still needed to
> > achieve a decent first step in this effort;
> 
> On the subject passing constraint, I'd like to mention
> draft-kompella-mpls-rsvp-constraints-00.txt (expired, but I could
> provide a copy upon request). It contains a fairly general mechanism
> for passing constraints in RSVP.
> 
> Yakov.
> 
> >
> > thanks,
> > - dimitri.
> >
> > Jean Philippe Vasseur wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Dimitri,
> > >
> > > cc'ing CCAMP - see in line,
> > >
> > > At 17:45 10/12/2002 +0100, Dimitri.Papadimitriou@alcatel.be wrote:
> > > >jp,
> > > >
> > > >in fact the below list should simply be as follows for
> > > >signalling-based methods: 1) constraint-passing 2) loose
> > > >routing and 3) path query;
> > > >
> > > >and the for constraint-passing we have a several i-d's
> > > >such as,
> > > >
> > > >http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-lee-ccamp-rsvp-te-exclude-route-
> 01.txt
> > > >
> > >
> > > this ID does not propose a mechanism to compute inter-area TE path
> > >
> > > >constraint passing may also be extended using the crank-
> > > >back as listed below; the usage scenarios of these methods
> > > >are described in the following:
> > > >
> > > >http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-kompella-mpls-multiarea-te-03.tx
> t
> > > >
> > > >now probably it is worth spending some time in considering
> > > >input coming from the tewg wrt to this effort, most of the
> > > >input that you see listed above has been produced over the
> > > >past year (and more) i can't imagine stepping in the protocol
> > > >details without a clear consensus on what do we want to cover
> > > >within the ccamp wg & w/o taking into account the tewg rec's
> > > >(probably better to discuss this on the ccamp mailing list)
> > >
> > > Fully agree with you. Hopefully multi-area TE should be soon part of the
> > > CCAMP charter.
> > >
> > > JP.
> > >
> > > >thanks,
> > > >- dimitri.
> > > >
> > > >Jean Philippe Vasseur wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > At 13:53 10/12/2002 +0530, sachin laddha wrote:
> > > > > >Hi,
> > > > > >'draft-ash-multi-area-te-reqmts-01.txt' stated in section 5 as
> > > > > >"Initial requirements are given here for protocol support of the
> > > > multi-area
> > > > > >TE methods, which include needs to support
> > > > > >
> > > > > >*       path-computation-server (PCS) functionality [kompella, lee,
> > > > vasseur,
> > > > > >te-qos-routing],
> > > > > >*       query functionality [query, vasseur],
> > > > > >*       crankback functionality [crankback],
> > > > > >
> > > > > >and, optionally,
> > > > > >
> > > > > >*       TE feedback functionality [feedback], and
> > > > > >*       summary-LSA functionality [summary_lsa]."
> > > > > >.
> > > > > >I want to know whether cisco/juniper routers (standard ones) supports
> > > > all of
> > > > > >the above extension.
> > > > > >or if not,how many.......or Whether router is supposed to support how
> many
> > > > > >...
> > > > >
> > > > > I do not think any vendor supports all the method mentioned above, but
> just
> > > > > a subset. If you are running a network, your feed-backs on your preferr
> ed
> > > > > method is very welcome.
> > > > >
> > > > > JP.
> > > > >
> > > > > >Regards,
> > > > > >---Sachin
> > > >
> > > >--
> > > >Papadimitriou Dimitri
> > > >E-mail : dimitri.papadimitriou@alcatel.be
> > > >Private: http://www.rc.bel.alcatel.be/~papadimd/index.html
> > > >E-mail : dpapadimitriou@psg.com
> > > >Public : http://psg.com/~dpapadimitriou/
> > > >Address: Fr. Wellesplein 1, B-2018 Antwerpen, Belgium
> > > >Phone  : Work: +32 3 2408491 - Home: +32 2 3434361
> >
> > --
> > Papadimitriou Dimitri
> > E-mail : dimitri.papadimitriou@alcatel.be
> > Private: http://www.rc.bel.alcatel.be/~papadimd/index.html
> > E-mail : dpapadimitriou@psg.com
> > Public : http://psg.com/~dpapadimitriou/
> > Address: Fr. Wellesplein 1, B-2018 Antwerpen, Belgium
> > Phone  : Work: +32 3 2408491 - Home: +32 2 3434361
> >

-- 
Papadimitriou Dimitri 
E-mail : dimitri.papadimitriou@alcatel.be 
Private: http://www.rc.bel.alcatel.be/~papadimd/index.html
E-mail : dpapadimitriou@psg.com
Public : http://psg.com/~dpapadimitriou/
Address: Fr. Wellesplein 1, B-2018 Antwerpen, Belgium
Phone  : Work: +32 3 2408491 - Home: +32 2 3434361