IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [CCAMP] IETF 89 Draft Agenda Posted

"BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A" <db3546@att.com> Wed, 19 February 2014 22:47 UTC

Return-Path: <db3546@att.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7257F1A02BE for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 14:47:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.748
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.748 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t0ht-KCUc8UT for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 14:47:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nbfkord-smmo07.seg.att.com (nbfkord-smmo07.seg.att.com [209.65.160.93]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22AEB1A02A1 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 14:47:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from unknown [144.160.229.24] (EHLO alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com) by nbfkord-smmo07.seg.att.com(mxl_mta-7.2.1-0) with ESMTP id a7435035.2abd52636940.6157787.00-2412.15905966.nbfkord-smmo07.seg.att.com (envelope-from <db3546@att.com>); Wed, 19 Feb 2014 22:47:22 +0000 (UTC)
X-MXL-Hash: 5305347a6e1f7a95-87ac25bcfdf78c4e555fcb43521ef2a659d857f5
Received: from unknown [144.160.229.24] (EHLO alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com) by nbfkord-smmo07.seg.att.com(mxl_mta-7.2.1-0) over TLS secured channel with ESMTP id 17435035.0.6157714.00-2347.15905772.nbfkord-smmo07.seg.att.com (envelope-from <db3546@att.com>); Wed, 19 Feb 2014 22:47:17 +0000 (UTC)
X-MXL-Hash: 5305347529a53c6e-dd2f3c7b4a6a262c261a7382899de859ee6a95d7
Received: from enaf.aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s1JMlCUk010942; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 17:47:13 -0500
Received: from mlpi409.sfdc.sbc.com (mlpi409.sfdc.sbc.com [130.9.128.241]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s1JMl6ph010876 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 19 Feb 2014 17:47:07 -0500
Received: from MISOUT7MSGHUBAC.ITServices.sbc.com (MISOUT7MSGHUBAC.itservices.sbc.com [130.9.129.147]) by mlpi409.sfdc.sbc.com (RSA Interceptor); Wed, 19 Feb 2014 22:46:57 GMT
Received: from MISOUT7MSGUSR9O.ITServices.sbc.com ([144.151.223.75]) by MISOUT7MSGHUBAC.ITServices.sbc.com ([130.9.129.147]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 17:46:57 -0500
From: "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A" <db3546@att.com>
To: John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net>, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, Fatai Zhang <zhangfatai@huawei.com>, CCAMP <ccamp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] IETF 89 Draft Agenda Posted
Thread-Index: AQHPLCtbRGqYnDeYM0uuhkav+3L3Bpq8Q7+AgADGJYCAAAKFAIAAIy1A
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 22:46:56 +0000
Message-ID: <F64C10EAA68C8044B33656FA214632C80C14B0D7@MISOUT7MSGUSR9O.ITServices.sbc.com>
References: <530285F1.2020304@labn.net> <F82A4B6D50F9464B8EBA55651F541CF85CABD9E8@SZXEMA504-MBS.china.huawei.com> <5304CD8F.6000204@labn.net> <997abac1a05e4dad9fa57cd80ec7b710@BLUPR05MB562.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <997abac1a05e4dad9fa57cd80ec7b710@BLUPR05MB562.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.70.127.38]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-RSA-Inspected: yes
X-RSA-Classifications: public
X-AnalysisOut: [v=2.0 cv=N9We4RBB c=1 sm=1 a=dhB6nF3YHL5t/Ixux6cINA==:17 a]
X-AnalysisOut: [=e0XAxa7mZdMA:10 a=ofMgfj31e3cA:10 a=m5K82lhEibEA:10 a=BLc]
X-AnalysisOut: [eEmwcHowA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=zQP7CpKOAAAA:8 a=XIqpo32R]
X-AnalysisOut: [AAAA:8 a=ZbqieztQOSwA:10 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=AIMVWHhIVZJKYg]
X-AnalysisOut: [D7rFMA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=lZB815dzVvQA:10 a=u8xnIDvkm63]
X-AnalysisOut: [gMI_J:21 a=W6zTfJfm2b7I8_EP:21]
X-Spam: [F=0.2000000000; CM=0.500; S=0.200(2010122901)]
X-MAIL-FROM: <db3546@att.com>
X-SOURCE-IP: [144.160.229.24]
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/CYa4o8n1QLW2k18vJJrmAkQ09T0
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] IETF 89 Draft Agenda Posted
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 22:47:27 -0000

All,

We are trying to arrange a time and room to allow for informal discussion on the diversity draft before our meeting on Thursday. We'll announce on the list when we have a time/room.
Thanks,
Deborah and Lou


-----Original Message-----
From: CCAMP [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of John E Drake
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 10:37 AM
To: Lou Berger; Fatai Zhang; CCAMP
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] IETF 89 Draft Agenda Posted

Lou,

Spoken like a true WG chair.  (I can almost hear you clearing your throat 8->.) 

Yours Irrespectively,

John

> -----Original Message-----
> From: CCAMP [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lou Berger
> Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 7:28 AM
> To: Fatai Zhang; CCAMP
> Subject: Re: [CCAMP] IETF 89 Draft Agenda Posted
> 
> Fatai,
> 	Our intent is to have the current WG draft authors propose how they
> think the document should move forward based on the WG LC comments.
> Given that we are not meeting until Thursday, I'd hope that WG draft authors
> take advantage of this and work/meet with the authors of the related drafts to
> come up with an approach that is inclusive of the issues and alternatives
> mentioned.
> 
> Lou
> 
> On 2/18/2014 10:39 PM, Fatai Zhang wrote:
> > Hi Lou,
> >
> > Do you think if it is better to put presentation #4,#12,#13 close (ie., treat
> them as a group topic like diversity route)?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Best Regards
> >
> > Fatai
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: CCAMP [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lou Berger
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 5:58 AM
> > To: CCAMP
> > Subject: [CCAMP] IETF 89 Draft Agenda Posted
> >
> >
> > All,
> > 	The draft agenda for London was posted earlier today at:
> > http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/89/agenda/agenda-89-ccamp
> >
> > Please let us (Daniele & chairs) know if you have comments or if we
> > missed anything.
> >
> > Authors of WG documents,
> >
> > As usual:
> >
> > If presenting, please plan to review (present) any changes that have
> > been recently made, any open discussions or issues, as well as planned
> > next steps.
> >
> > If you are not presenting, please send this information to the WG mail
> > list *1 week* prior to the WG meeting.
> >
> > Much thanks,
> > Lou, Deborah (& Daniele)
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CCAMP mailing list
> > CCAMP@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CCAMP mailing list
> CCAMP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp
> 


_______________________________________________
CCAMP mailing list
CCAMP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email