Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Signaling drafts WGdocuments
gyzhang@sina.com Thu, 29 September 2011 20:57 UTC
Return-Path: <gyzhang@sina.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0CCF21F8AF9 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 13:57:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m+EBiJk1cKmq for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 13:57:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail228-175.sinamail.sina.com.cn (mail228-175.sinamail.sina.com.cn [60.28.228.175]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC82721F8B95 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 13:57:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqoEAKuyhE6sEMk3/3poAEGCTYIYoj+BaYFTAQEBBQEBOzAgBgQJFCMECQIaBTISEYdvp3AIkXCFfTVhBIdwkSiMBQ
Received: from unknown (HELO mail2-55.sinamail.sina.com.cn) ([172.16.201.55]) by irtj11-90.sinamail.sina.com.cn with ESMTP; 30 Sep 2011 05:00:48 +0800
Received: by mail2-55.sinamail.sina.com.cn (Postfix, from userid 99) id 4094438C831; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 05:00:47 +0800 (CST)
Received: from gyzhang@sina.com([75.26.177.16]) by mail2-55.sinamail.sina.com.cn via HTTP; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 05:00:47 +0800 (CST)
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 05:00:47 +0800
From: gyzhang@sina.com
To: ccamp@ietf.org, lberger@labn.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
X-MessageID: 1317330047.24.35677
X-OriginaIP: 60.28.2.55
X-Mailer: Sina WebMail 4.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=-sinamail_alt_d0f3231eaa79733efbc2be984b56c5b6"
Message-Id: <20110929210047.4094438C831@mail2-55.sinamail.sina.com.cn>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Signaling drafts WGdocuments
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 20:57:59 -0000
Yes, support to both (as co-author of signalling draft). Guoying 2011-09-29 gyzhang Lou Berger 2011-09-28 09:32:13 CCAMP [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Signaling drafts WGdocuments This message starts a two week poll on making the documents listed below ccamp working group documents. Please send a mail to the mailing list indicating "yes/support to both" or "no/do not support either". Of course, you may also support one but not the other. (We will assume that you support/object to both if you don't specify.) If indicating no, please state your technical reservations with the document. The documents being polled are: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ceccarelli-ccamp-gmpls-ospf-g709-07 http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-evolving-g709-09 The poll ends Wednesday October 12. Please also bear in mind that WG adoption does not signify that work is complete on the documents or that the technical details are fixed, but rather that further development of the documents will take place based on WG process. Much thanks, Lou (and Deborah) _______________________________________________ CCAMP mailing list CCAMP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp