IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Signaling drafts WGdocuments

"Gruman, Fred" <fred.gruman@us.fujitsu.com> Thu, 29 September 2011 16:12 UTC

Return-Path: <fred.gruman@us.fujitsu.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03A9521F8C80 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 09:12:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iexWhI29IH4d for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 09:12:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fncnmp03.fnc.fujitsu.com (fncnmp03.fnc.fujitsu.com [168.127.0.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7102E21F8C6C for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 09:12:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.68,462,1312174800"; d="scan'208";a="480021745"
Received: from rchemxp01.fnc.net.local ([168.127.134.111]) by fncnmp01.fnc.fujitsu.com with ESMTP; 29 Sep 2011 11:15:38 -0500
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 11:15:32 -0500
Message-ID: <F01646262154A14BBD2EFB3580FD8B9103CAE7BA@rchemxp01.fnc.net.local>
In-Reply-To: <4E834C0D.5030800@labn.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Signaling drafts WGdocuments
Thread-Index: Acx9/DbpbJvnCRmETiqyaZKXSoy5uQAxqdYg
References: <4E834C0D.5030800@labn.net>
From: "Gruman, Fred" <fred.gruman@us.fujitsu.com>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, CCAMP <ccamp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Signaling drafts WGdocuments
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 16:12:52 -0000

Yes/Support both.

Regards,

Fred Gruman
Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc.



-----Original Message-----
From: ccamp-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
Of Lou Berger
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 11:32 AM
To: CCAMP
Subject: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Signaling drafts
WGdocuments

This message starts a two week poll on making the documents listed below
ccamp working group documents.  Please send a mail to the mailing list
indicating "yes/support to both" or "no/do not support either".  Of
course, you may also support one but not the other.  (We will assume
that you support/object to both if you don't specify.)

If indicating no, please state your technical reservations with the
document.

The documents being polled are:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ceccarelli-ccamp-gmpls-ospf-g709-07
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-evolving-g709-09

The poll ends Wednesday October 12.

Please also bear in mind that WG adoption does not signify that work is
complete on the documents or that the technical details are fixed, but
rather that further development of the documents will take place based
on WG process.

Much thanks,
Lou (and Deborah)
_______________________________________________
CCAMP mailing list
CCAMP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email