Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Signaling drafts WG documents
Malcolm.BETTS@zte.com.cn Thu, 29 September 2011 15:11 UTC
Return-Path: <malcolm.betts@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D36121F8E1A for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 08:11:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.638
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.638 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.200, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_DOUBLE_IP_LOOSE=0.76, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7FKmEXdHiLIx for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 08:11:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx5.zte.com.cn (mx5.zte.com.cn [63.217.80.70]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58B7521F8E19 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 08:11:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.30.17.99] by mx5.zte.com.cn with surfront esmtp id 41713473195744; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 23:12:34 +0800 (CST)
Received: from [10.30.3.21] by [192.168.168.15] with StormMail ESMTP id 75544.984958751; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 23:14:01 +0800 (CST)
Received: from notes_smtp.zte.com.cn ([10.30.1.239]) by mse02.zte.com.cn with ESMTP id p8TFDs45023792; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 23:13:54 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from Malcolm.BETTS@zte.com.cn)
In-Reply-To: <4E834C0D.5030800@labn.net>
References: <4E834C0D.5030800@labn.net>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-KeepSent: C306BB6C:B6A1A037-8525791A:00539C68; type=4; name=$KeepSent
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 8.5.1 September 28, 2009
Message-ID: <OFC306BB6C.B6A1A037-ON8525791A.00539C68-8525791A.0053AC9E@zte.com.cn>
From: Malcolm.BETTS@zte.com.cn
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 11:13:33 -0400
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on notes_smtp/zte_ltd(Release 8.5.1FP4|July 25, 2010) at 2011-09-29 23:13:58, Serialize complete at 2011-09-29 23:13:58
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 0053AC9C8525791A_="
X-MAIL: mse02.zte.com.cn p8TFDs45023792
Cc: CCAMP <ccamp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Signaling drafts WG documents
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 15:11:14 -0000
Yes, support both. Regards, Malcolm Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Sent by: ccamp-bounces@ietf.org 28/09/2011 12:32 PM To CCAMP <ccamp@ietf.org> cc Subject [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Signaling drafts WG documents This message starts a two week poll on making the documents listed below ccamp working group documents. Please send a mail to the mailing list indicating "yes/support to both" or "no/do not support either". Of course, you may also support one but not the other. (We will assume that you support/object to both if you don't specify.) If indicating no, please state your technical reservations with the document. The documents being polled are: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ceccarelli-ccamp-gmpls-ospf-g709-07 http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-evolving-g709-09 The poll ends Wednesday October 12. Please also bear in mind that WG adoption does not signify that work is complete on the documents or that the technical details are fixed, but rather that further development of the documents will take place based on WG process. Much thanks, Lou (and Deborah) _______________________________________________ CCAMP mailing list CCAMP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Sign… fu.xihua
- [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Signalin… Lou Berger
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Sign… John E Drake
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Sign… Ong, Lyndon
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Sign… Rajan Rao
- [CCAMP] 答复: Poll on making G.709 Routing and Sign… Zhangfatai
- [CCAMP] 答复: Poll on making G.709 Routing and Sign… Huawei danli
- [CCAMP] 答复: Poll on making G.709 Routing and Sign… wang.qilei
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Sign… Huub van Helvoort
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Sign… Yuji Tochio
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Sign… Ping Pan
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Sign… GRANDI, PIETRO VITTORIO (PIETRO VITTORIO)
- [CCAMP] R: Poll on making G.709 Routing and Signa… BELOTTI, SERGIO (SERGIO)
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Sign… Gruman, Fred
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Sign… Steve Balls
- [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Signalin… Varma, Eve L (Eve)
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Sign… PELOSO, PIERRE (PIERRE)
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Sign… Margaria, Cyril (NSN - DE/Munich)
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Sign… Dieter Beller
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Sign… Malcolm.BETTS
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Sign… Leeyoung
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Sign… Lam, Hing-Kam (Kam)
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Sign… Jonathan Hardwick
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Sign… Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Sign… Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Sign… zhang.fei3
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Sign… Khuzema Pithewan
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Sign… Lou Berger