IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Signaling drafts WG documents

Huub van Helvoort <huubatwork@gmail.com> Thu, 29 September 2011 03:16 UTC

Return-Path: <huubatwork@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEEF01F0CDE for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 20:16:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.149
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.149 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iebLXEizrSfy for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 20:16:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pz0-f50.google.com (mail-pz0-f50.google.com [209.85.210.50]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 131C41F0CAE for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 20:16:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pzk37 with SMTP id 37so485901pzk.9 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 20:19:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:disposition-notification-to:date:from:reply-to :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=o7gf9EHY+JYTJmRE0Y5srNJ6DNXlcxBlKNulnYVZ57Y=; b=FNVI850nlKqzCE/6OsitYYt3oNwgIsQh+pVRov1gEf1Z6s4yzlv+++ITPdG+14XrB1 zfifgBqYp/u9F5QUvZNjdQqJCm7kZzoPE+cbNcjOMEZhDLVkYEC+AOdT1m3BvB+fpf3n DOWUT/1BfEJbKg8tz6dlzfxWZh/AuFDOQCisY=
Received: by 10.68.7.132 with SMTP id j4mr49210955pba.102.1317266360829; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 20:19:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from McAsterix.local ([118.112.186.108]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h5sm1570105pbq.11.2011.09.28.20.19.17 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 28 Sep 2011 20:19:19 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4E83E3AA.6020203@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 05:19:06 +0200
From: Huub van Helvoort <huubatwork@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: CCAMP <ccamp@ietf.org>
References: <4E834C0D.5030800@labn.net> <92A1F6CF27D54D4DA5364E59D892A02AF4BE6B@szxeml526-mbs.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <92A1F6CF27D54D4DA5364E59D892A02AF4BE6B@szxeml526-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="GB2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Signaling drafts WG documents
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: huubatwork@gmail.com
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 03:16:39 -0000

Yes, support to both!

Regards, Huub.

> ________________________________________
> 发件人: ccamp-bounces@ietf.org [ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Lou Berger [lberger@labn.net]
> 发送时间: 2011年9月29日 0:32
> 到: CCAMP
> 主题: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Signaling drafts WG documents
> 
> This message starts a two week poll on making the documents listed below
> ccamp working group documents.  Please send a mail to the mailing list
> indicating "yes/support to both" or "no/do not support either".  Of
> course, you may also support one but not the other.  (We will assume
> that you support/object to both if you don't specify.)
> 
> If indicating no, please state your technical reservations with the
> document.
> 
> The documents being polled are:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ceccarelli-ccamp-gmpls-ospf-g709-07
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-evolving-g709-09
> 
> The poll ends Wednesday October 12.
> 
> Please also bear in mind that WG adoption does not signify that work is
> complete on the documents or that the technical details are fixed, but
> rather that further development of the documents will take place based
> on WG process.
> 
> Much thanks,
> Lou (and Deborah)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email