IETF Logo Mail Archive

[CCAMP] 答复: Poll on making G.709 Routing and Signaling drafts WG documents

wang.qilei@zte.com.cn Thu, 29 September 2011 02:38 UTC

Return-Path: <wang.qilei@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 860FA1F0D20 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 19:38:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -91.987
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-91.987 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=0.803, RCVD_DOUBLE_IP_LOOSE=0.76, SARE_SUB_ENC_GB2312=1.345, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CVj88DmcDrbb for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 19:38:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx5.zte.com.cn (mx6.zte.com.cn [95.130.199.165]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA4141F0D1E for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 19:38:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.30.17.99] by mx5.zte.com.cn with surfront esmtp id 46621473195744; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 10:38:47 +0800 (CST)
Received: from [10.30.3.21] by [192.168.168.15] with StormMail ESMTP id 75544.473195744; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 10:41:32 +0800 (CST)
Received: (from root@localhost) by mse02.zte.com.cn id p8T2fVTr040355 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 10:41:31 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from wang.qilei@zte.com.cn)
Message-Id: <201109290241.p8T2fVTr040355@mse02.zte.com.cn>
Received: from notes_smtp.zte.com.cn ([10.30.1.239]) by mse02.zte.com.cn with ESMTP id p8T28UPD039592; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 10:08:30 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from wang.qilei@zte.com.cn)
In-Reply-To: <4E834C0D.5030800@labn.net>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-KeepSent: F2008244:EB6B1F32-4825791A:000B9486; type=4; name=$KeepSent
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5.6 March 06, 2007
From: wang.qilei@zte.com.cn
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 10:08:20 +0800
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on notes_smtp/zte_ltd(Release 8.5.1FP4|July 25, 2010) at 2011-09-29 10:08:31, Serialize complete at 2011-09-29 10:08:31
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 000BC5474825791A_="
X-MAIL: mse02.zte.com.cn p8T2fVTr040355
X-MSS: AUDITRELEASE@mse02.zte.com.cn
Cc: CCAMP <ccamp@ietf.org>, ccamp-bounces@ietf.org
Subject: [CCAMP] 答复: Poll on making G.709 Routing and Signaling drafts WG documents
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 02:38:57 -0000

support both

thanks
Qilei Wang




Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> 
发件人:  ccamp-bounces@ietf.org
2011-09-29 00:32

收件人
CCAMP <ccamp@ietf.org>
抄送

主题
[CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Signaling drafts WG    documents






This message starts a two week poll on making the documents listed below
ccamp working group documents.  Please send a mail to the mailing list
indicating "yes/support to both" or "no/do not support either".  Of
course, you may also support one but not the other.  (We will assume
that you support/object to both if you don't specify.)

If indicating no, please state your technical reservations with the
document.

The documents being polled are:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ceccarelli-ccamp-gmpls-ospf-g709-07
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-evolving-g709-09

The poll ends Wednesday October 12.

Please also bear in mind that WG adoption does not signify that work is
complete on the documents or that the technical details are fixed, but
rather that further development of the documents will take place based
on WG process.

Much thanks,
Lou (and Deborah)
_______________________________________________
CCAMP mailing list
CCAMP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email