IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Signaling drafts WGdocuments

Rajan Rao <rrao@infinera.com> Thu, 29 September 2011 00:15 UTC

Return-Path: <rrao@infinera.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4F6C21F8E3E for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 17:15:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mJ0JiGHnrRIW for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 17:15:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sv-casht-prod2.infinera.com (sv-casht-prod2.infinera.com [8.4.225.25]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4822821F8E3D for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 17:15:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SV-EXDB-PROD1.infinera.com ([fe80::dc68:4e20:6002:a8f9]) by sv-casht-prod2.infinera.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 17:18:26 -0700
From: Rajan Rao <rrao@infinera.com>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, CCAMP <ccamp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Signaling drafts WGdocuments
Thread-Index: Acx9/DOeJL3al7rQRUSyCaDKssN+MQACATMwAAgh3vA=
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 00:18:26 +0000
Message-ID: <650AA355E323C34D9D4AAEED952E053D0AB8EA6C@SV-EXDB-PROD1.infinera.com>
References: <4E834C0D.5030800@labn.net> <A0B4FC0A5EFBD44585414760DB4FD2742A6F5CBB@MDWEXGMB02.ciena.com>
In-Reply-To: <A0B4FC0A5EFBD44585414760DB4FD2742A6F5CBB@MDWEXGMB02.ciena.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.100.96.93]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Signaling drafts WGdocuments
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 00:15:39 -0000

Yes to both drafts.

Thanks
Rajan
(co-author)

-----Original Message-----
From: ccamp-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lou Berger
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 9:32 AM
To: CCAMP
Subject: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Signaling drafts WG documents

This message starts a two week poll on making the documents listed below
ccamp working group documents.  Please send a mail to the mailing list
indicating "yes/support to both" or "no/do not support either".  Of
course, you may also support one but not the other.  (We will assume
that you support/object to both if you don't specify.)

If indicating no, please state your technical reservations with the
document.

The documents being polled are:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ceccarelli-ccamp-gmpls-ospf-g709-07
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-evolving-g709-09

The poll ends Wednesday October 12.

Please also bear in mind that WG adoption does not signify that work is
complete on the documents or that the technical details are fixed, but
rather that further development of the documents will take place based
on WG process.

Much thanks,
Lou (and Deborah)
_______________________________________________
CCAMP mailing list
CCAMP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp


_______________________________________________
CCAMP mailing list
CCAMP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email