IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Signaling drafts WG documents

Ping Pan <ping@pingpan.org> Thu, 29 September 2011 03:46 UTC

Return-Path: <ping@pingpan.org>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A10AF11E80CC for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 20:46:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.834
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.834 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.142, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HWxcUDXhCzI2 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 20:46:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og118.obsmtp.com (exprod7og118.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.8]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id CA9A311E80A4 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 20:46:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vw0-f45.google.com ([209.85.212.45]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob118.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKToPquTZ91eub74PN6kXhF2XO355968e7@postini.com; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 20:49:21 PDT
Received: by vws17 with SMTP id 17so157793vws.4 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 20:49:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.97.36 with SMTP id dx4mr9238907vdb.146.1317268153066; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 20:49:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.160.40 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 20:48:29 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4E834C0D.5030800@labn.net>
References: <4E834C0D.5030800@labn.net>
From: Ping Pan <ping@pingpan.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 11:48:29 +0800
Message-ID: <CAHEV9L2EJPN7cJ6HRO9-5r9RiPC4rS8_hjW5T+C67x_h0GqY6A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="20cf307f31a656655704ae0c6405"
Cc: CCAMP <ccamp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Signaling drafts WG documents
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 03:46:31 -0000

Yes to both.

On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 12:32 AM, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> wrote:

> This message starts a two week poll on making the documents listed below
> ccamp working group documents.  Please send a mail to the mailing list
> indicating "yes/support to both" or "no/do not support either".  Of
> course, you may also support one but not the other.  (We will assume
> that you support/object to both if you don't specify.)
>
> If indicating no, please state your technical reservations with the
> document.
>
> The documents being polled are:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ceccarelli-ccamp-gmpls-ospf-g709-07
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-evolving-g709-09
>
> The poll ends Wednesday October 12.
>
> Please also bear in mind that WG adoption does not signify that work is
> complete on the documents or that the technical details are fixed, but
> rather that further development of the documents will take place based
> on WG process.
>
> Much thanks,
> Lou (and Deborah)
> _______________________________________________
> CCAMP mailing list
> CCAMP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email