Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Signaling drafts WG documents

Leeyoung <leeyoung@huawei.com> Thu, 29 September 2011 15:16 UTC

Return-Path: <leeyoung@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0E5C21F8D94 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 08:16:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.56
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.56 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.039, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nYPF4ZwXKVYw for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 08:16:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usaga04-in.huawei.com (usaga04-in.huawei.com [206.16.17.180]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DE1021F8D70 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 08:16:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (usaga04-in [172.18.4.101]) by usaga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LSA00AYNIFYRX@usaga04-in.huawei.com> for ccamp@ietf.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 10:16:46 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from dfweml202-edg.china.huawei.com ([172.18.4.104]) by usaga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LSA00KU9IFX11@usaga04-in.huawei.com> for ccamp@ietf.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 10:16:46 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from DFWEML402-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.102) by dfweml202-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.9.108) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.270.1; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 08:16:46 -0700
Received: from DFWEML501-MBX.china.huawei.com ([fe80::c52a:9e19:87eb:4531]) by DFWEML402-HUB.china.huawei.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.01.0270.001; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 08:16:38 -0700
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 15:16:37 +0000
From: Leeyoung <leeyoung@huawei.com>
In-reply-to: <4E834C0D.5030800@labn.net>
X-Originating-IP: [10.47.131.9]
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, CCAMP <ccamp@ietf.org>
Message-id: <7AEB3D6833318045B4AE71C2C87E8E171817E21A@DFWEML501-MBX.china.huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-language: en-US
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Accept-Language: en-US
Thread-topic: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Signaling drafts WG documents
Thread-index: AQHMffzqJFSDykXTbU+9Wa1Hisj6R5VkeYVA
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
References: <4E834C0D.5030800@labn.net>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Signaling drafts WG documents
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 15:16:05 -0000

Support both.

Young

-----Original Message-----
From: ccamp-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lou Berger
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 11:32 AM
To: CCAMP
Subject: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Signaling drafts WG documents

This message starts a two week poll on making the documents listed below
ccamp working group documents.  Please send a mail to the mailing list
indicating "yes/support to both" or "no/do not support either".  Of
course, you may also support one but not the other.  (We will assume
that you support/object to both if you don't specify.)

If indicating no, please state your technical reservations with the
document.

The documents being polled are:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ceccarelli-ccamp-gmpls-ospf-g709-07
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-evolving-g709-09

The poll ends Wednesday October 12.

Please also bear in mind that WG adoption does not signify that work is
complete on the documents or that the technical details are fixed, but
rather that further development of the documents will take place based
on WG process.

Much thanks,
Lou (and Deborah)
_______________________________________________
CCAMP mailing list
CCAMP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp