IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Signaling drafts WGdocuments

"Ong, Lyndon" <Lyong@Ciena.com> Wed, 28 September 2011 17:28 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=325227afd3=lyong@ciena.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F09DD21F8D7B for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 10:28:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.39
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.39 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.125, BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0nc55s1IbycD for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 10:28:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00103a01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00103a01.pphosted.com [67.231.152.227]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65EA821F8CCB for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 10:28:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0001124 [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00103a01.pphosted.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with SMTP id p8SHUGsw029431; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 13:31:33 -0400
Received: from mdwexght01.ciena.com (LIN1-118-36-28.ciena.com [63.118.36.28]) by mx0b-00103a01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 1047ucg1rp-1 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 28 Sep 2011 13:31:28 -0400
Received: from MDWEXGMB02.ciena.com ([::1]) by MDWEXGHT01.ciena.com ([::1]) with mapi; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 13:31:29 -0400
From: "Ong, Lyndon" <Lyong@Ciena.com>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, CCAMP <ccamp@ietf.org>
Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 13:31:29 -0400
Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Signaling drafts WGdocuments
Thread-Index: Acx9/DOeJL3al7rQRUSyCaDKssN+MQACATMw
Message-ID: <A0B4FC0A5EFBD44585414760DB4FD2742A6F5CBB@MDWEXGMB02.ciena.com>
References: <4E834C0D.5030800@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <4E834C0D.5030800@labn.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.0.0.1412-6.800.1017-18414.000
x-tm-as-result: No--39.560200-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.4.6813, 1.0.211, 0.0.0000 definitions=2011-09-28_05:2011-09-28, 2011-09-27, 1970-01-01 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=2 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1109280195
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Signaling drafts WGdocuments
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 17:28:46 -0000

Support both (contributor to both, though).

Lyndon



-----Original Message-----
From: ccamp-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lou Berger
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 9:32 AM
To: CCAMP
Subject: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Signaling drafts WG documents

This message starts a two week poll on making the documents listed below
ccamp working group documents.  Please send a mail to the mailing list
indicating "yes/support to both" or "no/do not support either".  Of
course, you may also support one but not the other.  (We will assume
that you support/object to both if you don't specify.)

If indicating no, please state your technical reservations with the
document.

The documents being polled are:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ceccarelli-ccamp-gmpls-ospf-g709-07
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-evolving-g709-09

The poll ends Wednesday October 12.

Please also bear in mind that WG adoption does not signify that work is
complete on the documents or that the technical details are fixed, but
rather that further development of the documents will take place based
on WG process.

Much thanks,
Lou (and Deborah)
_______________________________________________
CCAMP mailing list
CCAMP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email