Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Signaling drafts WG documents
zhang.fei3@zte.com.cn Sat, 08 October 2011 05:22 UTC
Return-Path: <zhang.fei3@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 751FE21F8B3C; Fri, 7 Oct 2011 22:22:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -97.668
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-97.668 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.033, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_DOUBLE_IP_LOOSE=0.76, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rH-Kkwm-8HZK; Fri, 7 Oct 2011 22:22:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx5.zte.com.cn (mx6.zte.com.cn [95.130.199.165]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45AEF21F861E; Fri, 7 Oct 2011 22:22:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.30.17.100] by mx5.zte.com.cn with surfront esmtp id 466211461793122; Sat, 8 Oct 2011 13:21:30 +0800 (CST)
Received: from [10.30.3.21] by [192.168.168.16] with StormMail ESMTP id 39725.1973556129; Sat, 8 Oct 2011 13:25:35 +0800 (CST)
Received: from notes_smtp.zte.com.cn ([10.30.1.239]) by mse02.zte.com.cn with ESMTP id p985Po1X050088; Sat, 8 Oct 2011 13:25:50 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from zhang.fei3@zte.com.cn)
In-Reply-To: <4E834C0D.5030800@labn.net>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-KeepSent: E7D7CE3D:64A50EE9-48257923:001DC050; type=4; name=$KeepSent
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5.6 March 06, 2007
Message-ID: <OFE7D7CE3D.64A50EE9-ON48257923.001DC050-48257923.001DD510@zte.com.cn>
From: zhang.fei3@zte.com.cn
Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2011 13:25:43 +0800
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on notes_smtp/zte_ltd(Release 8.5.1FP4|July 25, 2010) at 2011-10-08 13:25:52, Serialize complete at 2011-10-08 13:25:52
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 001DD50D48257923_="
X-MAIL: mse02.zte.com.cn p985Po1X050088
Cc: CCAMP <ccamp@ietf.org>, ccamp-bounces@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Signaling drafts WG documents
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2011 05:22:55 -0000
yes/support to both Fei Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> 发件人: ccamp-bounces@ietf.org 2011-09-29 00:32 收件人 CCAMP <ccamp@ietf.org> 抄送 主题 [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Signaling drafts WG documents This message starts a two week poll on making the documents listed below ccamp working group documents. Please send a mail to the mailing list indicating "yes/support to both" or "no/do not support either". Of course, you may also support one but not the other. (We will assume that you support/object to both if you don't specify.) If indicating no, please state your technical reservations with the document. The documents being polled are: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ceccarelli-ccamp-gmpls-ospf-g709-07 http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-evolving-g709-09 The poll ends Wednesday October 12. Please also bear in mind that WG adoption does not signify that work is complete on the documents or that the technical details are fixed, but rather that further development of the documents will take place based on WG process. Much thanks, Lou (and Deborah) _______________________________________________ CCAMP mailing list CCAMP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Sign… fu.xihua
- [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Signalin… Lou Berger
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Sign… John E Drake
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Sign… Ong, Lyndon
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Sign… Rajan Rao
- [CCAMP] 答复: Poll on making G.709 Routing and Sign… Zhangfatai
- [CCAMP] 答复: Poll on making G.709 Routing and Sign… Huawei danli
- [CCAMP] 答复: Poll on making G.709 Routing and Sign… wang.qilei
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Sign… Huub van Helvoort
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Sign… Yuji Tochio
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Sign… Ping Pan
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Sign… GRANDI, PIETRO VITTORIO (PIETRO VITTORIO)
- [CCAMP] R: Poll on making G.709 Routing and Signa… BELOTTI, SERGIO (SERGIO)
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Sign… Gruman, Fred
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Sign… Steve Balls
- [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Signalin… Varma, Eve L (Eve)
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Sign… PELOSO, PIERRE (PIERRE)
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Sign… Margaria, Cyril (NSN - DE/Munich)
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Sign… Dieter Beller
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Sign… Malcolm.BETTS
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Sign… Leeyoung
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Sign… Lam, Hing-Kam (Kam)
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Sign… Jonathan Hardwick
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Sign… Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Sign… Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Sign… zhang.fei3
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Sign… Khuzema Pithewan
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Sign… Lou Berger