IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Signaling drafts WG documents

"Lam, Hing-Kam (Kam)" <kam.lam@alcatel-lucent.com> Thu, 29 September 2011 15:55 UTC

Return-Path: <kam.lam@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CD6221F8E4A for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 08:55:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.277
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.277 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.322, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jUOcDA-oYkxc for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 08:55:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ihemail2.lucent.com (ihemail2.lucent.com [135.245.0.35]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE7D421F8CAB for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 08:55:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usnavsmail3.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (usnavsmail3.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com [135.3.39.11]) by ihemail2.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id p8TFvsL0017042 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 29 Sep 2011 10:57:54 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from USNAVSXCHHUB01.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (usnavsxchhub01.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com [135.3.39.110]) by usnavsmail3.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/GMO) with ESMTP id p8TFvrCX009487 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 29 Sep 2011 10:57:54 -0500
Received: from USNAVSXCHMBSA2.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.3.39.124]) by USNAVSXCHHUB01.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.3.39.110]) with mapi; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 10:57:53 -0500
From: "Lam, Hing-Kam (Kam)" <kam.lam@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, CCAMP <ccamp@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 10:56:32 -0500
Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Signaling drafts WG documents
Thread-Index: Acx9/DSDg1+VqGM3QmeUu+nDq/cmqAAwRfDw
Message-ID: <7F76AEFB05C38145BABA0D545E3CFFD58007D949@USNAVSXCHMBSA2.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <4E834C0D.5030800@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <4E834C0D.5030800@labn.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.35
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 135.3.39.11
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Signaling drafts WG documents
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 15:55:04 -0000

yes/support to both

--Kam

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ccamp-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
> Of Lou Berger
> Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 12:32 PM
> To: CCAMP
> Subject: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Signaling drafts WG
> documents
> 
> This message starts a two week poll on making the documents listed
> below
> ccamp working group documents.  Please send a mail to the mailing list
> indicating "yes/support to both" or "no/do not support either".  Of
> course, you may also support one but not the other.  (We will assume
> that you support/object to both if you don't specify.)
> 
> If indicating no, please state your technical reservations with the
> document.
> 
> The documents being polled are:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ceccarelli-ccamp-gmpls-ospf-g709-07
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-evolving-g709-09
> 
> The poll ends Wednesday October 12.
> 
> Please also bear in mind that WG adoption does not signify that work is
> complete on the documents or that the technical details are fixed, but
> rather that further development of the documents will take place based
> on WG process.
> 
> Much thanks,
> Lou (and Deborah)
> _______________________________________________
> CCAMP mailing list
> CCAMP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email