IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Signaling drafts WGdocuments

"Margaria, Cyril (NSN - DE/Munich)" <cyril.margaria@nsn.com> Thu, 29 September 2011 12:31 UTC

Return-Path: <cyril.margaria@nsn.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE1DC21F8CE5 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 05:31:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.084
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.084 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.515, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PGliJc0uOa7A for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 05:31:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (demumfd001.nsn-inter.net [93.183.12.32]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DE6621F8CE4 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 05:31:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.129.55]) by demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id p8TCYL9M028534 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 29 Sep 2011 14:34:21 +0200
Received: from demuexc022.nsn-intra.net (demuexc022.nsn-intra.net [10.150.128.35]) by demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id p8TCYK6b031177; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 14:34:21 +0200
Received: from DEMUEXC012.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.128.23]) by demuexc022.nsn-intra.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 29 Sep 2011 14:34:12 +0200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 14:34:10 +0200
Message-ID: <D5EABC6FDAFDAA47BC803114C68AABF202E42D6B@DEMUEXC012.nsn-intra.net>
In-Reply-To: <4E834C0D.5030800@labn.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Signaling drafts WGdocuments
Thread-Index: Acx9/DJJVs7VcE26SYyMXYx2JVEwpAAp9/YA
References: <4E834C0D.5030800@labn.net>
From: "Margaria, Cyril (NSN - DE/Munich)" <cyril.margaria@nsn.com>
To: ext Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, CCAMP <ccamp@ietf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Sep 2011 12:34:12.0012 (UTC) FILETIME=[17740EC0:01CC7EA4]
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Signaling drafts WGdocuments
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 12:31:33 -0000

Support both


> -----Original Message-----
> From: ccamp-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
> Of ext Lou Berger
> Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 6:32 PM
> To: CCAMP
> Subject: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Signaling drafts
> WGdocuments
> 
> This message starts a two week poll on making the documents listed
> below ccamp working group documents.  Please send a mail to the
mailing
> list indicating "yes/support to both" or "no/do not support either".
> Of course, you may also support one but not the other.  (We will
assume
> that you support/object to both if you don't specify.)
> 
> If indicating no, please state your technical reservations with the
> document.
> 
> The documents being polled are:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ceccarelli-ccamp-gmpls-ospf-g709-07
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-evolving-g709-09
> 
> The poll ends Wednesday October 12.
> 
> Please also bear in mind that WG adoption does not signify that work
is
> complete on the documents or that the technical details are fixed, but
> rather that further development of the documents will take place based
> on WG process.
> 
> Much thanks,
> Lou (and Deborah)
> _______________________________________________
> CCAMP mailing list
> CCAMP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email