IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Signaling drafts WG documents

Khuzema Pithewan <kpithewan@infinera.com> Sat, 08 October 2011 10:03 UTC

Return-Path: <kpithewan@infinera.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FCE321F862F for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 8 Oct 2011 03:03:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.46
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.46 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.139, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TXqr5NGg1cmm for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 8 Oct 2011 03:03:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sv-casht-prod1.infinera.com (sv-casht-prod1.infinera.com [8.4.225.24]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACA9921F8610 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Sat, 8 Oct 2011 03:03:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SV-EXDB-PROD1.infinera.com ([fe80::dc68:4e20:6002:a8f9]) by sv-casht-prod1.infinera.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Sat, 8 Oct 2011 03:06:21 -0700
From: Khuzema Pithewan <kpithewan@infinera.com>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, CCAMP <ccamp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Signaling drafts WG documents
Thread-Index: Acx9/DJPkUNXepToQ/qQoVRu7x7iRQFSm5fgAJbLeDA=
Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2011 10:06:20 +0000
Message-ID: <D8D01B39D6B38C45AA37C06ECC1D65D50ABEE493@SV-EXDB-PROD1.infinera.com>
References: <4E834C0D.5030800@labn.net> <B5630A95D803744A81C51AD4040A6DAA1680D7D78C@ESESSCMS0360.eemea.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <B5630A95D803744A81C51AD4040A6DAA1680D7D78C@ESESSCMS0360.eemea.ericsson.se>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.100.156.108]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Signaling drafts WG documents
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2011 10:03:09 -0000

Yes. Support to both.

Khuzema

-----Original Message-----
From: ccamp-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lou Berger
Sent: mercoledì 28 settembre 2011 18.32
To: CCAMP
Subject: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Signaling drafts WG documents

This message starts a two week poll on making the documents listed below ccamp working group documents.  Please send a mail to the mailing list indicating "yes/support to both" or "no/do not support either".  Of course, you may also support one but not the other.  (We will assume that you support/object to both if you don't specify.)

If indicating no, please state your technical reservations with the document.

The documents being polled are:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ceccarelli-ccamp-gmpls-ospf-g709-07
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-evolving-g709-09

The poll ends Wednesday October 12.

Please also bear in mind that WG adoption does not signify that work is complete on the documents or that the technical details are fixed, but rather that further development of the documents will take place based on WG process.

Much thanks,
Lou (and Deborah)
_______________________________________________
CCAMP mailing list
CCAMP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp
_______________________________________________
CCAMP mailing list
CCAMP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email