IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Signaling drafts WG documents

Jonathan Hardwick <Jonathan.Hardwick@metaswitch.com> Fri, 30 September 2011 16:12 UTC

Return-Path: <Jonathan.Hardwick@metaswitch.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5443F21F8C4C for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 09:12:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.739
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.739 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.140, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q89fgYM7hQAr for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 09:12:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from enficsets2.metaswitch.com (enficsets2.metaswitch.com [192.91.191.39]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A03C21F8C48 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 09:12:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ENFIRHMBX1.datcon.co.uk (172.18.74.36) by enficsets2.metaswitch.com (172.18.4.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.339.1; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 17:15:28 +0100
Received: from ENFICSMBX1.datcon.co.uk ([fe80::d5d5:c683:a3be:3a19]) by ENFIRHMBX1.datcon.co.uk ([fe80::b06d:4d13:5f63:3715%19]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 17:15:29 +0100
From: Jonathan Hardwick <Jonathan.Hardwick@metaswitch.com>
To: labn - Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, CCAMP <ccamp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Signaling drafts WG documents
Thread-Index: AQHMffwxGv+NlgVKTk+tKHLOesdgg5VmG/dw
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 16:15:28 +0000
Message-ID: <09CE6C3BE5E1EA40B987BF5F25D8DDBA208DF136@ENFICSMBX1.datcon.co.uk>
References: <4E834C0D.5030800@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <4E834C0D.5030800@labn.net>
Accept-Language: en-US, en-GB
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [172.18.72.13]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Signaling drafts WG documents
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 16:12:36 -0000

Yes - support both.

-----Original Message-----
From: ccamp-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lou Berger
Sent: 28 September 2011 17:32
To: CCAMP
Subject: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Signaling drafts WG documents

This message starts a two week poll on making the documents listed below
ccamp working group documents.  Please send a mail to the mailing list
indicating "yes/support to both" or "no/do not support either".  Of
course, you may also support one but not the other.  (We will assume
that you support/object to both if you don't specify.)

If indicating no, please state your technical reservations with the
document.

The documents being polled are:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ceccarelli-ccamp-gmpls-ospf-g709-07
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-evolving-g709-09

The poll ends Wednesday October 12.

Please also bear in mind that WG adoption does not signify that work is
complete on the documents or that the technical details are fixed, but
rather that further development of the documents will take place based
on WG process.

Much thanks,
Lou (and Deborah)
_______________________________________________
CCAMP mailing list
CCAMP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email