Re: [CCAMP] Comments on slides presented for draft-ashok-ccamp-gmpls-ospf-g709-00
Rajan Rao <rrao@infinera.com> Tue, 09 November 2010 03:44 UTC
Return-Path: <rrao@infinera.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5537F3A695E for <ccamp@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 19:44:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.765
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.765 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.233, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_31=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ErwcQkeZxSxX for <ccamp@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 19:44:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from outgoing1.infinera.com (outgoing1.infinera.com [8.4.225.36]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D01C3A6930 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 19:44:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from SV-EXDB1.infinera.com ([10.100.97.31]) by sv-exhub1.infinera.com ([10.100.97.36]) with mapi; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 19:44:16 -0800
From: Rajan Rao <rrao@infinera.com>
To: "Sadler, Jonathan B." <Jonathan.Sadler@tellabs.com>, Ashok Kunjidhapatham <akunjidhapatham@infinera.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 19:44:20 -0800
Thread-Topic: Comments on slides presented for draft-ashok-ccamp-gmpls-ospf-g709-00
Thread-Index: Act/tLEdhHdj9XqoTKO3UNcg8al1tAACjmQg
Message-ID: <35F57DFB766CCA4FBF4F3F680FA9D2CA6AC3F24B99@SV-EXDB1.infinera.com>
References: <5292FFA96EC22A4386067E9DBCC0CD2BE1C0F0DD4A@EX-NAP.tellabs-west.tellabsinc.net>
In-Reply-To: <5292FFA96EC22A4386067E9DBCC0CD2BE1C0F0DD4A@EX-NAP.tellabs-west.tellabsinc.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_35F57DFB766CCA4FBF4F3F680FA9D2CA6AC3F24B99SVEXDB1infine_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>, Yalin Wang <ywang@infinera.com>, Radhakrishna Valiveti <rvaliveti@infinera.com>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Comments on slides presented for draft-ashok-ccamp-gmpls-ospf-g709-00
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 03:44:50 -0000
Sadler, Please refer to table 7-9 in G.709-V3. The ODU3 requires 31 TSs from OPU4. So, if you create 2xODU3s on an OTU4 link, you would consume 62 TSs out of 80. The number of ODU0s you can support on an ODU3 is 32. Hence you get 82. The operators will use this trick to increase the number of ODU0s they can carry over ODU4 links. Regards Rajan From: Sadler, Jonathan B. [mailto:Jonathan.Sadler@tellabs.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 11:21 AM To: Rajan Rao; Ashok Kunjidhapatham Cc: ccamp@ietf.org Subject: Comments on slides presented for draft-ashok-ccamp-gmpls-ospf-g709-00 Hi Rao and Ashok, My comment is specific to slide 7 of http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/79/slides/ccamp-10.pptx which you presented at the CCAMP session this AM in Beijing. Your side shows the capacity of ODU0s supported on the link as 82. This is inconsistent of my understanding of the Tributary Slot definition for ODU4. Can you provide detail on how this number was reached? Thanks, Jonathan Sadler
- [CCAMP] Comments on slides presented for draft-as… Sadler, Jonathan B.
- Re: [CCAMP] Comments on slides presented for draf… Rajan Rao