[CCAMP] Comments on slides presented for draft-ashok-ccamp-gmpls-ospf-g709-00

"Sadler, Jonathan B." <Jonathan.Sadler@tellabs.com> Tue, 09 November 2010 03:20 UTC

Return-Path: <Jonathan.Sadler@tellabs.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89A1A3A68EB for <ccamp@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 19:20:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.498
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.498 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.500, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_31=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j-1SYviLzR3j for <ccamp@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 19:20:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from VA3EHSOBE004.bigfish.com (va3ehsobe004.messaging.microsoft.com [216.32.180.14]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9279D28C23F for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 19:20:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail104-va3-R.bigfish.com (10.7.14.250) by VA3EHSOBE004.bigfish.com (10.7.40.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.8; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 03:20:46 +0000
Received: from mail104-va3 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail104-va3-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2915E7D037F for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 03:20:46 +0000 (UTC)
X-SpamScore: -29
X-BigFish: VPS-29(zz4015Lzz1202hzz8275bh8275dh1033IL186Mz2dh65h)
X-Spam-TCS-SCL: 4:0
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPVD:NLI; H:mx4.tellabs.com; RD:mx4.tellabs.com; EFVD:NLI
Received: from mail104-va3 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail104-va3 (MessageSwitch) id 1289272845152663_1907; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 03:20:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from VA3EHSMHS026.bigfish.com (unknown [10.7.14.245]) by mail104-va3.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1875DA2804D for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 03:20:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx4.tellabs.com (204.154.129.57) by VA3EHSMHS026.bigfish.com (10.7.99.36) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.8; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 03:20:42 +0000
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.59,173,1288569600"; d="scan'208,217"; a="1333810416"
Received: from usnvwwmspht01.hq.tellabs.com (HELO usnvwwmspht01.tellabs-west.tellabsinc.net) ([172.23.211.69]) by mx4-priv.tellabs.com with ESMTP; 09 Nov 2010 03:20:42 +0000
Received: from EX-NAP.tellabs-west.tellabsinc.net ([172.23.211.71]) by usnvwwmspht01.tellabs-west.tellabsinc.net ([172.23.211.69]) with mapi; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 21:20:42 -0600
From: "Sadler, Jonathan B." <Jonathan.Sadler@tellabs.com>
To: "rrao@infinera.com" <rrao@infinera.com>, "akunjidhapatham@infinera.com" <akunjidhapatham@infinera.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 21:20:41 -0600
Thread-Topic: Comments on slides presented for draft-ashok-ccamp-gmpls-ospf-g709-00
Thread-Index: Act/tLEdhHdj9XqoTKO3UNcg8al1tA==
Message-ID: <5292FFA96EC22A4386067E9DBCC0CD2BE1C0F0DD4A@EX-NAP.tellabs-west.tellabsinc.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_5292FFA96EC22A4386067E9DBCC0CD2BE1C0F0DD4AEXNAPtellabsw_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: tellabs.com
Cc: "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>
Subject: [CCAMP] Comments on slides presented for draft-ashok-ccamp-gmpls-ospf-g709-00
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 03:20:24 -0000

Hi Rao and Ashok,

My comment is specific to slide 7 of http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/79/slides/ccamp-10.pptx which you presented at the CCAMP session this AM in Beijing.

Your side shows the capacity of ODU0s supported on the link as 82.  This is inconsistent of my understanding of the Tributary Slot definition for ODU4.  Can you provide detail on how this number was reached?

Thanks,

Jonathan Sadler