Re: [CCAMP] Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-ccamp-layer1-types-16: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Italo Busi <Italo.Busi@huawei.com> Wed, 14 February 2024 13:17 UTC
Return-Path: <Italo.Busi@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CF2AC151064; Wed, 14 Feb 2024 05:17:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.903
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.903 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d-3Ab_qd7Qm2; Wed, 14 Feb 2024 05:17:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86432C14F6EC; Wed, 14 Feb 2024 05:17:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.231]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4TZdtQ23yDz67L8m; Wed, 14 Feb 2024 21:13:34 +0800 (CST)
Received: from frapeml100008.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.182.85.131]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 875F5140DAF; Wed, 14 Feb 2024 21:17:00 +0800 (CST)
Received: from frapeml500007.china.huawei.com (7.182.85.172) by frapeml100008.china.huawei.com (7.182.85.131) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.35; Wed, 14 Feb 2024 14:17:00 +0100
Received: from frapeml500007.china.huawei.com ([7.182.85.172]) by frapeml500007.china.huawei.com ([7.182.85.172]) with mapi id 15.01.2507.035; Wed, 14 Feb 2024 14:17:00 +0100
From: Italo Busi <Italo.Busi@huawei.com>
To: Éric Vyncke <evyncke@cisco.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-ccamp-layer1-types@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ccamp-layer1-types@ietf.org>, "ccamp-chairs@ietf.org" <ccamp-chairs@ietf.org>, "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>, "dceccare@cisco.com" <dceccare@cisco.com>, "daniel@olddog.co.uk" <daniel@olddog.co.uk>, "dirkvhugo@gmail.com" <dirkvhugo@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-ccamp-layer1-types-16: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHaLNxB08UWMOLiIkiAbKch+C+ZUbEKJbFA
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 13:17:00 +0000
Message-ID: <c75660b2726a4affbb50bfb1b798fdda@huawei.com>
References: <170237272392.12415.1146730833544614094@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <170237272392.12415.1146730833544614094@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: it-IT, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.203.246.111]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/IZrkMaT1QaW7LjJhRiN_zetUBHU>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-ccamp-layer1-types-16: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 13:17:05 -0000
Dear Eric, Thank you for the review, the authors have updated the document to address your comments and posted the updated document as draft-ietf-ccamp-layer1-types-17 Updates include: - Added clarification text for "Layer 1" networks to avoid confusion of the Title - Expanded the Security and highlighted that write operations without proper protection can have a negative effect on network operations Again, thanks for the support and review. Authors, Haomian and Italo. > -----Original Message----- > From: Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> > Sent: martedì 12 dicembre 2023 10:19 > To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org> > Cc: draft-ietf-ccamp-layer1-types@ietf.org; ccamp-chairs@ietf.org; > ccamp@ietf.org; dceccare@cisco.com; daniel@olddog.co.uk; > daniel@olddog.co.uk; dirkvhugo@gmail.com > Subject: [CCAMP] Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-ccamp-layer1-types-16: > (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) > > Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-ccamp-layer1-types-16: Discuss > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email > addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory > paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to > https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot- > positions/ > for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT > positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-layer1-types/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > DISCUSS: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > # Éric Vyncke, INT AD, comments for raft-ietf-ccamp-layer1-types-16 > > Thank you for the work put into this document. As I am not an optical expert, > I > have only reviewed the overall structure. > > Please find below one blocking DISCUSS points (easy to address), and one > non-blocking COMMENT point. > > Special thanks to Daniel King for the shepherd's detailed write-up including > the WG consensus *and* the justification of the intended status. > > Other thanks to Dirk Von Hugo, the Internet directorate reviewer (at my > request), please consider this int-dir review: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-ccamp-layer1-types-16-intdir- > telechat-von-hugo-2023-12-09/ > (even if only nits, it would be nice to see a reply from the authors) > > I hope that this review helps to improve the document, > > Regards, > > -éric > > # DISCUSS (blocking) > > As noted in https://www.ietf.org/blog/handling-iesg-ballot-positions/, a > DISCUSS ballot is a request to have a discussion on the following topics: > > ## Layer 1 vs. OTN > > The I-D title and the abstract first sentence (as well as CCAMP charter) are > misleading: it is *not* about generic layer-1 but only about a very specific > one: OTN. I.e., the content does not match the wrapping, please update the > title and the abstract. > > Obviously, this is not a DISCUSS level point but I want to get a discussion > with the authors and the responsible AD(s) before clearing my ballot to > either > NoObj (if the scope is changed) or to abstain (if text/title is unchanged). > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > # COMMENTS (non-blocking) > > ## Section 7 > > Should the writable data nodes be listed with the associated security > vulnerabilities ? Per https://wiki.ietf.org/group/ops/yang-security-guidelines > > >
- [CCAMP] Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-ccamp… Éric Vyncke via Datatracker
- Re: [CCAMP] Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-c… Italo Busi
- Re: [CCAMP] Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-c… Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: [CCAMP] Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-c… Daniele Ceccarelli (dceccare)
- Re: [CCAMP] Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-c… Italo Busi
- Re: [CCAMP] Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-c… Roman Danyliw
- Re: [CCAMP] Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-c… BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A
- Re: [CCAMP] Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-c… Italo Busi
- Re: [CCAMP] Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-c… Eric Vyncke (evyncke)