RE: New CCAMP I-Ds

Young Lee <ylee@huawei.com> Tue, 18 March 2008 18:28 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ccamp-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ccamp-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D8BB3A695D for <ietfarch-ccamp-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Mar 2008 11:28:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.495
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.495 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TyX5DBs53sZQ for <ietfarch-ccamp-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Mar 2008 11:28:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DE293A6812 for <ccamp-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Mar 2008 11:28:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.68 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org>) id 1JbgQY-000Jcs-K9 for ccamp-data@psg.com; Tue, 18 Mar 2008 18:20:46 +0000
Received: from [206.16.17.180] (helo=usaga04-in.huawei.com) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.68 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <ylee@huawei.com>) id 1JbgQS-000JZw-Hm for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Tue, 18 Mar 2008 18:20:44 +0000
Received: from huawei.com (usaga04-in [172.18.9.16]) by usaga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0JXX0096RUYFTK@usaga04-in.huawei.com> for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Tue, 18 Mar 2008 13:20:40 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from Lee736821 ([10.124.12.51]) by usaga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0JXX00IN5UYB7Z@usaga04-in.huawei.com> for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Tue, 18 Mar 2008 13:20:39 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 12:20:33 -0600
From: Young Lee <ylee@huawei.com>
Subject: RE: New CCAMP I-Ds
In-reply-to: <043e01c888f6$628ab910$0200a8c0@your029b8cecfe>
To: 'Adrian Farrel' <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Message-id: <000f01c88924$c2062630$330c7c0a@china.huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Thread-index: AciI9qTnueK1/nOeR/2D6Wd9mRLpawALgaug
Sender: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk

 
Yes for all four. 

draft-xie-ccamp-lsp-dppm-02.txt
draft-caviglia-ccamp-pc-spc-grsvpte-ext-02.txt
draft-bradford-ccamp-path-key-ero-01.txt
draft-li-ccamp-confirm-data-channel-status-03.txt

Young
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf
Of Adrian Farrel
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 6:43 AM
To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Subject: New CCAMP I-Ds

Hi,

We took an action in Philadelphia to poll you on a long list of potential
new working group I-Ds.

We are splitting this list into three largely for our own sanity. Don't
worry if your favorite I-D is not in the first (or second) batch. We will
get to it by the end of the month.

Can you please answer yes or no for the following I-Ds. You are encouraged
to give reasons especially for negative responses).

Thanks,
Adrian and Deborah

===

draft-xie-ccamp-lsp-dppm-02.txt
draft-caviglia-ccamp-pc-spc-grsvpte-ext-02.txt
draft-bradford-ccamp-path-key-ero-01.txt
draft-li-ccamp-confirm-data-channel-status-03.txt