IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [CCAMP] AD review: draft-ietf-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-03

"Matt Hartley (mhartley)" <mhartley@cisco.com> Tue, 24 May 2016 18:18 UTC

Return-Path: <mhartley@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A770812D97B; Tue, 24 May 2016 11:18:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.946
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.946 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oj-gB-ia1rw4; Tue, 24 May 2016 11:18:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-2.cisco.com (alln-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.142.89]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF13012D10E; Tue, 24 May 2016 11:18:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=11358; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1464113904; x=1465323504; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=MpdYeYuzzYukyzV8NnjZ6B5yuOBWOyrLBjrTWu8imYo=; b=NUE1OE37DZyIX1I9/6Zs4WNW4eVkjArpEBckzx0Xb5mC6kqjlG1HBUud VoNj8aR0VWYc/7zYZenk/+Xo8C2ayqgESL+i6MkxNHKK6sxHgCsO2COr5 iV7Zl60Pb79PReGut7gc93HAWewGICct+Z3/+o0NCA3hTBuJw4rq4I2fQ s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BUAgCzmkRX/4kNJK1cgmxLVn0GtQWEeQENgXaGEQKBMzgUAQEBAQEBAWUnhEIBAQEELUwQAgEIEQQBASgHMhQJCAEBBAENBQiIJ8QAAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBHIYnhEyEdYUkBZg3AY4YjyOPSwEeAQFCg21uiQgBfgEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,360,1459814400"; d="scan'208,217";a="275890943"
Received: from alln-core-4.cisco.com ([173.36.13.137]) by alln-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 24 May 2016 18:18:07 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (xch-rcd-003.cisco.com [173.37.102.13]) by alln-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u4OII7G0011484 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 24 May 2016 18:18:07 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.102.11) by XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (173.37.102.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Tue, 24 May 2016 13:18:06 -0500
Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) by XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Tue, 24 May 2016 13:18:06 -0500
From: "Matt Hartley (mhartley)" <mhartley@cisco.com>
To: "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A" <db3546@att.com>, "draft-ietf-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: AD review: draft-ietf-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-03
Thread-Index: AdG12ZU3Hn1o2/7BQ0+B9TwkvrvMNAADwIsg
Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 18:18:06 +0000
Message-ID: <8ea0130ce76d4a00abf35243d96bb848@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com>
References: <F64C10EAA68C8044B33656FA214632C852958337@MISOUT7MSGUSRDE.ITServices.sbc.com>
In-Reply-To: <F64C10EAA68C8044B33656FA214632C852958337@MISOUT7MSGUSRDE.ITServices.sbc.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [161.44.193.123]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_8ea0130ce76d4a00abf35243d96bb848XCHRCD001ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/SV3D6L5W4rFZcLOF2U3l3esVc8k>
Cc: "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>, "ccamp-chairs@ietf.org" <ccamp-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] AD review: draft-ietf-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-03
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 18:18:27 -0000

Thanks, Deborah. I'll get that done.

Cheers

Matt

From: BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A [mailto:db3546@att.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 12:51 PM
To: draft-ietf-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3@ietf.org
Cc: ccamp-chairs@ietf.org; ccamp@ietf.org
Subject: AD review: draft-ietf-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-03

Hi,

I've reviewed this draft, and have a few comments:

*        The document is Informational, I don't think we can say it "Updates" RFC7139. Remove this.
*        In the Abstract, remove "updates RFC 7139" to say "This document defines new signal types for these additional containers".
*        Even though the document shepherd write-up has the rationale on why this is Informational, I think we need a couple of sentences in the draft itself. I suggest we add to the end of the Introduction:
"These containers are non-standard data plane frame formats (not defined in ITU-T Recommendations). They are among some of the intra-domain approaches used in networks for transport of 10GBASE-R signals in optical transport networks. As a Supplement, [G.Sup43], does not guarantee interoperability in the data plane for these containers."

Thanks,
Deborah

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email