IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [CCAMP] AD review: draft-ietf-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-03

"BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A" <db3546@att.com> Wed, 25 May 2016 21:20 UTC

Return-Path: <db3546@att.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39CCD12DD98; Wed, 25 May 2016 14:20:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Vwhp35EkIsRs; Wed, 25 May 2016 14:20:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com [67.231.149.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DAEBD12DDA1; Wed, 25 May 2016 14:20:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0049297.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0049297.ppops.net-00191d01. (8.16.0.11/8.16.0.11) with SMTP id u4PLIjCg048572; Wed, 25 May 2016 17:20:15 -0400
Received: from alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (sbcsmtp7.sbc.com [144.160.229.24]) by m0049297.ppops.net-00191d01. with ESMTP id 235k64hcx5-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 25 May 2016 17:20:14 -0400
Received: from enaf.aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u4PLKCti014785; Wed, 25 May 2016 17:20:13 -0400
Received: from mlpi408.sfdc.sbc.com (mlpi408.sfdc.sbc.com [130.9.128.240]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u4PLK2aM014617 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 25 May 2016 17:20:09 -0400
Received: from MISOUT7MSGHUBAE.ITServices.sbc.com (MISOUT7MSGHUBAE.itservices.sbc.com [130.9.129.149]) by mlpi408.sfdc.sbc.com (RSA Interceptor); Wed, 25 May 2016 21:19:44 GMT
Received: from MISOUT7MSGUSRDE.ITServices.sbc.com ([169.254.5.5]) by MISOUT7MSGHUBAE.ITServices.sbc.com ([130.9.129.149]) with mapi id 14.03.0294.000; Wed, 25 May 2016 17:19:43 -0400
From: "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A" <db3546@att.com>
To: "Matt Hartley (mhartley)" <mhartley@cisco.com>, "draft-ietf-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: AD review: draft-ietf-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-03
Thread-Index: AdG12ZU3Hn1o2/7BQ0+B9TwkvrvMNAA7kE6wAAC4UoA=
Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 21:19:43 +0000
Message-ID: <F64C10EAA68C8044B33656FA214632C85296DD60@MISOUT7MSGUSRDE.ITServices.sbc.com>
References: <F64C10EAA68C8044B33656FA214632C852958337@MISOUT7MSGUSRDE.ITServices.sbc.com> <fadbcd4e4b61422b8d151c1826d75e4a@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <fadbcd4e4b61422b8d151c1826d75e4a@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.16.234.241]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_F64C10EAA68C8044B33656FA214632C85296DD60MISOUT7MSGUSRDE_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-RSA-Inspected: yes
X-RSA-Classifications: public
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2016-05-25_11:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_policy_notspam policy=outbound_policy score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1604210000 definitions=main-1605250254
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/StEKalMo-Ez_8feAsyX6raGWq-8>
Cc: "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>, "ccamp-chairs@ietf.org" <ccamp-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] AD review: draft-ietf-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-03
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 21:20:17 -0000

Hi Matt,
Great - Thanks- I'll start the IETF Last Call.
Deborah


From: Matt Hartley (mhartley) [mailto:mhartley@cisco.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 4:56 PM
To: BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A <db3546@att.com>; draft-ietf-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3@ietf.org
Cc: ccamp-chairs@ietf.org; ccamp@ietf.org; Matt Hartley (mhartley) <mhartley@cisco.com>
Subject: RE: AD review: draft-ietf-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-03

Deborah,

Markups done, and v4 posted.

Cheers

Matt

From: BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A [mailto:db3546@att.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 12:51 PM
To: draft-ietf-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3@ietf.org>
Cc: ccamp-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:ccamp-chairs@ietf.org>; ccamp@ietf.org<mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
Subject: AD review: draft-ietf-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-03

Hi,

I've reviewed this draft, and have a few comments:

*         The document is Informational, I don't think we can say it "Updates" RFC7139. Remove this.
*         In the Abstract, remove "updates RFC 7139" to say "This document defines new signal types for these additional containers".
*         Even though the document shepherd write-up has the rationale on why this is Informational, I think we need a couple of sentences in the draft itself. I suggest we add to the end of the Introduction:
"These containers are non-standard data plane frame formats (not defined in ITU-T Recommendations). They are among some of the intra-domain approaches used in networks for transport of 10GBASE-R signals in optical transport networks. As a Supplement, [G.Sup43], does not guarantee interoperability in the data plane for these containers."

Thanks,
Deborah

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email