Re: [CCAMP] WSON updates for Optical Interface Classes

["Lam, Hing-Kam (Kam)" <[e-mail]>]

Hi,

In addition to the ones that Lyndon mentioned, should also include 
[ITU-T G.695]	Recommendation ITU-T G.695 (2010), Optical interfaces for coarse wavelength division multiplexing applications.

Regards,
Kam
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf
> Of Ong, Lyndon
> Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2012 12:45 PM
> To: Greg Bernstein; Lou Berger
> Cc: CCAMP; [e-mail]
> Subject: Re: [CCAMP] WSON updates for Optical Interface Classes
> 
> Hi Greg, Lou,
> 
> Sorry, a little confused - aren't you defining the OIC format within
> the wson encoding draft itself?  I would think the external references
> you need are for the ITU-T application codes, rather than the OIC
> format.  Am I missing something?
> 
> The ITU-T references would be
> [ITU-G.698.1] ITU-T Recommendation G.698.1, "Multichannel DWDM
> applications with
> single-channel optical interfaces", November, 2009.
> [ITU-G.698.2] ITU-T Recommendation G.698.2, "Amplified multichannel
> dense wavelength division multiplexing applications with single channel
> optical interfaces", November, 2009.
> [ITU-G.959.1] ITU-T Recommendation G.959.1, "Optical transport networks
> physical layer interfaces", February, 2012.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Lyndon
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf
> Of Greg Bernstein
> Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2012 9:19 AM
> To: Lou Berger
> Cc: CCAMP; [e-mail]
> Subject: Re: [CCAMP] WSON updates for Optical Interface Classes
> 
> Hi Lou, I'll try to update today or tomorrow.  On WSON routing, I still
> haven't heard from the OIC draft authors on resolving the undefined
> references mentioned below.
> Best Regards
> Greg
> On 8/15/2012 2:40 PM, Lou Berger wrote:
> > Greg/Authors,
> > 	When do you expect to have a rev of the signaling draft to match
> the
> > recent updates (including the previous addition of WSON-LSC type)?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Lou
> >
> > On 8/8/2012 1:04 PM, Greg Bernstein wrote:
> >> Hi CCAMPers, per working group consensus we have updated the
> >> following WSON drafts:
> >>
> >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-signal-
> compatibility
> >> -ospf-10
> >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-wson-encode-15
> >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-info-15.
> >>
> >> We have removed "modulation type", "FEC type", and "Bit rate range"
> and replace with the "Optical Interface Class".
> >> We have applied the changes suggested on the CCAMP list and in the
> OIC draft.
> >> There are some undefined references that need to be filled in by the
> authors of the OIC draft.
> >> Please furnish references or suitable text.
> >> Info draft:
> >> ..."Where the term <OPTICAL_INT_CLASS> is defined by [xyz]."
> >>
> >> Encoding draft:
> >> ..."The Optical Interface Class format is defined within [x-ref-
> tbd]."
> >>
> >> See updated drafts for further context. Also if an encoding example
> >> is desired for appendix A of the encoding draft please furnish.
> >>
> >> To ease and expedite further changes on the OIC issue MS Word
> >> versions of these documents can be found at:
> >> http://www.grotto-networking.com/sites/default/files/draft-ietf-
> ccamp
> >> -wson-signal-compatibility-ospf-10a.docx
> >> http://www.grotto-networking.com/sites/default/files/draft-ietf-
> ccamp
> >> -rwa-wson-encode-15a.docx
> >> http://www.grotto-networking.com/sites/default/files/draft-ietf-
> ccamp
> >> -rwa-info-15a.docx
> >>
> >> Best Regards
> >> Greg B.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> 
> 
> --
> ===================================================
> Dr Greg Bernstein, Grotto Networking [phone]
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CCAMP mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp
> _______________________________________________
> CCAMP mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp