Re: [CCAMP] 答复: RtgDir review: draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-behavior-negotiation-09

Julien Meuric <julien.meuric@orange.com> Tue, 22 January 2013 09:08 UTC

Return-Path: <julien.meuric@orange.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6533621F8526; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 01:08:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.797
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.797 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, SARE_SUB_ENC_UTF8=0.152]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GEpyT3-R2jG7; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 01:08:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com (p-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com [195.101.245.16]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A5B321F84D3; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 01:08:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 70BB81074003; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 10:12:57 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ftrdsmtp1.rd.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.192.128.46]) by p-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 658561074001; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 10:12:57 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ftrdmel10.rd.francetelecom.fr ([10.192.128.44]) by ftrdsmtp1.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 22 Jan 2013 10:08:07 +0100
Received: from [10.193.71.218] ([10.193.71.218]) by ftrdmel10.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 22 Jan 2013 10:08:06 +0100
Message-ID: <50FE56F5.8040806@orange.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 10:08:05 +0100
From: Julien Meuric <julien.meuric@orange.com>
Organization: France Telecom
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Lidan (Dan)" <huawei.danli@huawei.com>
References: <50F97FAC.3010903@orange.com> <92A1F6CF27D54D4DA5364E59D892A02A3884F3F1@szxeml555-mbx.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <92A1F6CF27D54D4DA5364E59D892A02A3884F3F1@szxeml555-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Jan 2013 09:08:06.0150 (UTC) FILETIME=[FD850260:01CDF87F]
Cc: "draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-behavior-negotiation.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-behavior-negotiation.all@tools.ietf.org>, "rtg-dir@ietf.org" <rtg-dir@ietf.org>, "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>, "rtg-ads@tools.ietf.org" <rtg-ads@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] =?utf-8?b?562U5aSNOiAgUnRnRGlyIHJldmlldzogZHJhZnQtaWV0?= =?utf-8?q?f-ccamp-lmp-behavior-negotiation-09?=
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 09:08:10 -0000

Hi Dan.

You're welcome.

I've added "very" on purpose, to emphasize what document the sentence 
was referring to (i.e. the RFC mentioned at the beginning of that very 
same sentence, not at the end of the previous one). It was just a 
suggestion, it isn't mandatory to keep it if you feel it's more 
confusing than clarifying. You may also check with a native English 
speaker (e.g. the RFC Editor), who I'm not.

Regards,

Julien


Le 22/01/2013 08:21, Lidan (Dan) a écrit :
> Julien,
>
> Thanks for the review, we will update the draft according to your comments.
>
> One comment needs your clarification:
> - s/functions defined in that document/functions specified in that very document/  [repetition of "defined"]
> For adding "very", is it a typo?
>
> For the reference [LMP-TEST], we will check with the authors of draft-cecczhang-ccamp-gmpls-g709v3-lmp, to see what's their intention.
>
> Thank you again!
>
> Dan
>
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: ccamp-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Julien Meuric
>
> Hello,
>
> I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft.
> The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related
> drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review. The purpose
> of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing ADs. For more
> information about the Routing Directorate, please see
> http://www.ietf.org/iesg/directorate/routing.html
>
> Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it
> would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF
> Last Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through
> discussion or by updating the draft.
>
> Document: draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-behavior-negotiation-09
> Reviewer: Julien Meuric
> Review Date: 18 January 2013
> IETF LC End Date: 21 January 2013
> Intended Status: Standards Track
>
> *Summary:*
> This document is basically ready for publication, but has nits that
> should be considered prior to it.
>
> *Comments:*
> This document is clearly written and easy to understand. The defined
> mechanism is simple and well specified.
>
> *Nits:*
> Abstract
> -Instead of "GMPLS networks", "GMPLS-controlled networks" reads more
> accurate to me. It would also align on the phrase used in the
> introduction. The resulting "Generalized Multiprotocol Label Switching
> (GMPLS)-controlled networks" may be checked with the RFC Editor.
>
> Introduction
> - s/LMP node/LMP-capable node/
> - s/functions defined in that document/functions specified in that very
> document/  [repetition of "defined"]
> - s/the message types from/the types from/  [repetition of "message"]
>
> Section 2.2
> - s/MAY include, HelloConfig/MAY include HelloConfig/
>
> Section 3.1
> - s/number of MBZ bits field/number of bits in MBZ field/
>
> Section 4
> - s/[RFC4202] defined/[RFC4202]-defined/
>
> Section 9.2
> - I tend to think that [LMP TEST] should now reference
> draft-cecczhang-ccamp-gmpls-g709v3-lmp
>
>
> Enjoy the week-end,
>
> Julien
>
> _______________________________________________
> CCAMP mailing list
> CCAMP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp