Re: [CCAMP] 2nd WG last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-ted-mib

Hi Masanori et al, 

I have a few minor comments on draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-ted-mib-08.  

* 	I agree with Wenhu's comments on the OSPF mailing list - we need to update the Textual Conventions to take into account ISIS syntax. 

*	The tedTable structure doesn't make it easy for network administrators to query just the TED entries that are learned from, say, OSPFv2 (rather than ISIS).  An easy fix for this would be to make the primary index field the information source (OSPFv2, ISIS etc).  This would also make the interpretation of the syntax of the remaining index fields straightforward for MIB agents.  

*	The tedLocalIfAddrTable and tedRemoteIfAddrTable both use an arbitrary index to distinguish between the different IP addresses on a given link.  Is there a reason why we can't just use the address type and address as index fields instead?  That would guarantee, for a given set of IP addresses, the ordering of rows in the table is entirely predictable. 

Thanks, 

Ben 
-----Original Message-----
From: ccamp-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of labn - Lou Berger
Sent: 18 April 2011 20:19
To: CCAMP
Subject: [CCAMP] 2nd WG last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-ted-mib

This mail begins a 2nd WG last call on:

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-ted-mib-08

The draft has been updated after the earlier working group primarily
based on MIB Dr. review and discussion on the ccamp list.

This working group last call ends on May 2nd. This LC will be announced
on the MPLS, OSPF, and ISIS WG lists.  Please send comments to
the CCAMP mailing list.

Lou (and Deborah)
_______________________________________________
CCAMP mailing list
CCAMP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp