RE: Layer 2 Switching Caps LSPs

Shahram Davari <Shahram_Davari@pmc-sierra.com> Tue, 25 January 2005 21:34 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA11836 for <ccamp-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 16:34:02 -0500 (EST)
Received: from psg.com ([147.28.0.62] ident=mailnull) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CtYan-0001SK-TY for ccamp-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 16:51:25 -0500
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.43 (FreeBSD)) id 1CtYBv-000Pqw-TW for ccamp-data@psg.com; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 21:25:39 +0000
Received: from [216.241.224.13] (helo=father.pmc-sierra.bc.ca) by psg.com with smtp (Exim 4.43 (FreeBSD)) id 1CtYBu-000Pqg-TQ for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 21:25:39 +0000
Received: (qmail 11926 invoked by uid 101); 25 Jan 2005 21:25:38 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ogmios.pmc-sierra.bc.ca) (216.241.226.59) by father.pmc-sierra.com with SMTP; 25 Jan 2005 21:25:38 -0000
Received: from bby1exi01.pmc_nt.nt.pmc-sierra.bc.ca (bby1exi01.pmc-sierra.bc.ca [216.241.231.251]) by ogmios.pmc-sierra.bc.ca (8.12.9/8.12.7) with ESMTP id j0PLPbAt027941; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 13:25:37 -0800
Received: by bby1exi01.pmc_nt.nt.pmc-sierra.bc.ca with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59) id <CPW1FWXV>; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 13:25:37 -0800
Message-ID: <4B6D09F3B826D411A67300D0B706EFDE0115D3A2@nt-exch-yow.pmc_nt.nt.pmc-sierra.bc.ca>
From: Shahram Davari <Shahram_Davari@pmc-sierra.com>
To: 'Adrian Farrel' <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Subject: RE: Layer 2 Switching Caps LSPs
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 13:25:36 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on psg.com
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.1
Sender: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 769a46790fb42fbb0b0cc700c82f7081

Hi,

The only issue that I have is with VLAN switching. Since VLAN switching
is not a standard 802.1Q behavior, it can't be used with existing Ethernet
hardware. Therefore the scope of this draft is not limited to control-plane,
and requires new data-plane that is not defined in IEEE yet.

If the VLAN switching is removed from the draft, I support accepting it as
a WG draft.

Yours,
-Shahram

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org]On
> Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
> Sent: Sunday, January 23, 2005 6:46 AM
> To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Layer 2 Switching Caps LSPs
> 
> 
> All,
> 
> There is a draft 
> (draft-papadimitriou-ccamp-gmpls-l2sc-lsp-03.txt) that we
> have discussed at several of the more recent CCAMP meetings, and have
> decided that the subject is within scope for our charter.
> 
> The questions we have faced have been:
> - is the problem well enough articulated?
> - is this the solution that the WG wants to pursue?
> - is there a high enough level of interest in this work?
> 
> If the answer to all three questions is "yes" then we can 
> adopt the draft
> as a WG document and move forwards.
> 
> Note: I think there are a large number of minor issues to 
> clear up with
> this draft, but hopefully this is orthogonal to whether we 
> make this a WG
> draft or not.
> 
> Thanks,
> Adrian
> 
>