[CCAMP] WG for delay-loss problem-statement & framework
Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Thu, 08 November 2012 22:16 UTC
Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8A5721F880A for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 14:16:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.383
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.383 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.216, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n53G5IFu21ec for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 14:16:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from oproxy11-pub.bluehost.com (oproxy11-pub.bluehost.com [173.254.64.10]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 2F85921F853B for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 14:16:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 6072 invoked by uid 0); 8 Nov 2012 22:15:58 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO box313.bluehost.com) (69.89.31.113) by oproxy11.bluehost.com with SMTP; 8 Nov 2012 22:15:58 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Subject:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=AsewMSfircysvoKiJzTA2ZDsateK18nYeilUZOQ5IP4=; b=WyTzaOBwL+pu1+p7d6yecDjObyGyFDq3EaPDNA1cqNJpw9gRsYksRiotD8Yof7TcmMj0wFQZg/utjSDpn9K6wAQfUczWFO6va1a8eQCApqLo8ilpjdfrtPJrjc7/kHKf;
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]:50153 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1TWaOE-0004z2-Cc; Thu, 08 Nov 2012 15:15:58 -0700
Message-ID: <509C2F21.6000301@labn.net>
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 17:16:01 -0500
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: mpls@ietf.org, CCAMP <ccamp@ietf.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth 69.89.31.113 authed with lberger@labn.net}
Subject: [CCAMP] WG for delay-loss problem-statement & framework
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 22:16:22 -0000
In the MPLS session, we just discussed if the following drafts should go to MPLS or CCAMP: draft-fuxh-mpls-delay-loss-te-problem-statement-01 draft-fuxh-mpls-delay-loss-te-framework-06 All the chairs in the room said it was up to the AD (Loa was on Jabber, Deborah was stuck in NJ). Adrian (our AD) just leaned over and said CCAMP, and I agree. So, I think we have our answer! Lou
- [CCAMP] WG for delay-loss problem-statement & fra… Lou Berger
- Re: [CCAMP] WG for delay-loss problem-statement &… Gregory Mirsky
- Re: [CCAMP] WG for delay-loss problem-statement &… Lou Berger