Re: [CCAMP] FW: New Version Notification for draft-zhang-ccamp-route-exclusion-pathkey-01.txt

"Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali@cisco.com> Thu, 20 February 2014 17:29 UTC

Return-Path: <zali@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1320A1A0209 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 09:29:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.049
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.049 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LPoqz7JlI1QW for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 09:29:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-4.cisco.com (alln-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.142.91]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 627CB1A01AF for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 09:29:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=695; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1392917392; x=1394126992; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=saYoGNy593NGX13z9Yt/nTkKWRVDqgvs23eoWdiV9Ik=; b=XNIvXGzHVroUzF1g3puZHYSgNAOB7mfY+IIq/s3sJ8nwgxYXRfb61J/z 5oWcqh2vNyMouF7FMf/py6eg+rjPGNEKsITS2TEcLQ3j1WXuuJsuU7uw5 6es0AQnU06bjUIG1s0QAH5vWz30aGBt21DgWwnhYEItWT6DDkvIXm5l51 4=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgIFADs6BlOtJXHA/2dsb2JhbABZgwaBD8AOgRAWdIIlAQEBBDo9DgYBCBEDAQIfQhwBCAIEARKIBc45F45rBoQyAQOYMJIkgW+BPoIq
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,513,1389744000"; d="scan'208";a="21943239"
Received: from rcdn-core2-5.cisco.com ([173.37.113.192]) by alln-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 20 Feb 2014 17:29:51 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x05.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x05.cisco.com [173.36.12.79]) by rcdn-core2-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s1KHTpR7008002 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 20 Feb 2014 17:29:51 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com ([169.254.4.212]) by xhc-aln-x05.cisco.com ([173.36.12.79]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 11:29:51 -0600
From: "Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali@cisco.com>
To: "Zhangxian (Xian)" <zhang.xian@huawei.com>, "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] FW: New Version Notification for draft-zhang-ccamp-route-exclusion-pathkey-01.txt
Thread-Index: AQHPKU2JCZBTfzFjP0WAW8oQDHTmA5q0SJCwgAo5FwA=
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 17:29:50 +0000
Message-ID: <CF2B7A14.9B243%zali@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <C636AF2FA540124E9B9ACB5A6BECCE6B301FD409@SZXEMA512-MBS.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.3.120616
x-originating-ip: [10.86.245.20]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <B039DA65D97AE44C9B8F8596C4F618DB@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/a_cjAS1_DL8hTi0WrkQow84R0KE
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] FW: New Version Notification for draft-zhang-ccamp-route-exclusion-pathkey-01.txt
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 17:29:57 -0000

-----Original Message-----
From: "Zhangxian   (Xian)" <zhang.xian@huawei.com>
Date: Friday, February 14, 2014 8:50 PM
To: "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>
Subject: [CCAMP] FW: New Version Notification for
draft-zhang-ccamp-route-exclusion-pathkey-01.txt

>1: Added a section describing how the Path Key resolution works, and it
>demonstrates that the proposed method can work in both the scenario with
>PCE, as well as WITHOUT PCE.
>

Hi Xian: 

When an ERO expanding node hits exclude Path Key(EXRS), it still needs to
lookup the path associated with the Path Key. So how do you achieve Path
Key lookup WITHOUT PCE?

More comments later,

Thanks

Regards...Zafar