IETF Logo Mail Archive

[CCAMP] draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-diversity-04

Khuzema Pithewan <kpithewan@infinera.com> Mon, 21 July 2014 20:40 UTC

Return-Path: <kpithewan@infinera.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E5041A041C for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 13:40:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.235
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.235 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7uDMBRekGqry for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 13:40:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outgoingmail1.infinera.com (outgoingmail1.infinera.com [204.128.141.23]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59BEF1A03FC for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 13:40:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SV-EX13-PRD1.infinera.com (10.100.103.228) by sv-ex13-prd1.infinera.com (10.100.103.228) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.847.32; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 13:39:49 -0700
Received: from SV-EX13-PRD1.infinera.com ([10.100.97.11]) by sv-ex13-prd1.infinera.com ([10.100.97.11]) with mapi id 15.00.0847.030; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 13:39:49 -0700
From: Khuzema Pithewan <kpithewan@infinera.com>
To: "CCAMP (ccamp@ietf.org)" <ccamp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-diversity-04
Thread-Index: Ac+lI2v9bVjKNUkXRe+uDGKIKuzl5A==
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 20:39:48 +0000
Message-ID: <e37060b5f88a48a68da993b086725904@sv-ex13-prd1.infinera.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.100.99.93]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_e37060b5f88a48a68da993b086725904svex13prd1infineracom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/iP83AjNOQXhujXiCojzVtJIQJP0
Subject: [CCAMP] draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-diversity-04
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 20:40:09 -0000

Authors :

It will be useful to have a recommendation section in draft to clarify which options can be used in what scenario. Some discussion on comparison /critique of options would help.

For example :

Option#1 has scalability issue if XROs are not used resulting in crankbacks one after another. So if client layer cannot provide XROs, option#2/3 should be used.

Thanks
Khuzema

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email