Re: [CCAMP] Comment on compatibility in draft-takacs-ccamp-revertive-ps

Dieter Beller <Dieter.Beller@alcatel-lucent.com> Sun, 10 November 2013 14:07 UTC

Return-Path: <Dieter.Beller@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBE9D21F9D7A for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 06:07:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=2.034, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=1.457, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cUOPxNkQbxwZ for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 06:07:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ihemail1.lucent.com (ihemail1.lucent.com [135.245.0.33]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9446921E8090 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 06:07:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (h135-239-2-42.lucent.com [135.239.2.42]) by ihemail1.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id rAAE7bgC006177 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sun, 10 Nov 2013 08:07:39 -0600 (CST)
Received: from destgsu0709.de.alcatel-lucent.com (slsv7at.de.alcatel-lucent.com [149.204.245.107]) by fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id rAAE7alh020485 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 10 Nov 2013 15:07:36 +0100
Received: from [135.244.176.115] (beller.lra.lucent.com [135.244.176.115]) (authenticated bits=0) by destgsu0709.de.alcatel-lucent.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id rAAE7XLM014537 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 10 Nov 2013 15:07:34 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <527F9325.1050502@alcatel-lucent.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2013 15:07:33 +0100
From: Dieter Beller <Dieter.Beller@alcatel-lucent.com>
Organization: Alcatel-Lucent
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali@cisco.com>
References: <CEA25E85.81FFE%zali@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <CEA25E85.81FFE%zali@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="------------040903000904050602040806"
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.33
Cc: CCAMP <ccamp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Comment on compatibility in draft-takacs-ccamp-revertive-ps
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2013 14:07:57 -0000

Hi Zafar,

this draft is defining signaling extensions for the hold-off time as well as the wait-to-restore time for protected LSPs
where applicable.

There are default values set for these timers in the data plane and signaling them in the control plane makes only
sense if the timer values shall differ from the default values. Do you see a need for that? IMO, operators typically
use the defaults and do not set these values on a per connection basis.


Thanks,
Dieter


On 08.11.2013 22:11, Zafar Ali (zali) wrote:
Hi Lou- 

You are right, the ctype is TBD, like I mentioned during the meeting that
we are using different ctype.

We would like to take this opportunity to solicit comments from the WG on
this draft. 

Thanks

Regards Š Zafar

-----Original Message-----
From: "lberger@labn.net" <lberger@labn.net>
Date: Thursday, November 7, 2013 6:17 PM
To: zali <zali@cisco.com>, "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>
Subject: Comment on compatibility in draft-takacs-ccamp-revertive-ps

Zafar,
	My comment in today's session was that you are redefining the format of
an existing object (by adding TLVs) this breaks compatibility.  You
stated that this wasn't the case.

FWIW:

Your document says:

   0                   1                   2                   3
   0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
  +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
  |            Length             | Class-Num(37) |   C-Type(2)   |
  +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
  |S|P|N|O| Reserved  | LSP Flags |      Reserved     | Link Flags|
  +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
  |I|R|   Reserved    | Seg.Flags |           Reserved            |
  +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
  |                                                               |
  ~                           sub-TLVs                            ~
  |                                                               |
  +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+


RFC4872 says
     0                   1                   2                   3
     0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
    |            Length             | Class-Num(37) | C-Type (2)    |
    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
    |S|P|N|O| Reserved  | LSP Flags |     Reserved      | Link Flags|
    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
    |                           Reserved                            |
    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Perhaps you meant C-Type(TBD).  You should address compatibility
explicitly in any case.

Lou
_______________________________________________
CCAMP mailing list
CCAMP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp" rel="nofollow">https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp

--

DIETER BELLER
ALCATEL-LUCENT DEUTSCHLAND AG
PROJECT MANAGER ASON/GMPLS CONTROL PLANE
IP ROUTING AND TRANSPORT BL
IP TRANSPORT BU

Lorenzstrasse 10
70435 Stuttgart, Germany
Phone: +49 711 821 43125
Mobil: +49 175 7266874

Alcatel-Lucent Deutschland AG
Domicile of the Company: Stuttgart · Local Court Stuttgart HRB 4026
Chairman of the Supervisory Board: Michael Oppenhoff
Board of Management: Wilhelm Dresselhaus (Chairman) · Hans-Jörg Daub · Andreas Gehe

This e-mail and its attachments, if any, may contain confidential information.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us and delete or destroy the e-mail and its attachments, if any, immediately.
If you have received this e-mail in error, you must not forward or make use of the e-mail and its attachments, if any.